Practice of and Thoughts on of Scientific Data Review

Abstract

Abstract: Agaisnt the backdrop of open access and data openness, data quality control is becoming an
important task. Data review is a critical part of data quality control in data publishing. Data review has
made some progress in practice now. Based on the relevant literature about research data review, this paper
analyzes data repository review, data journal review, and data material review with relevant practices.
Finally, it summarizes the problems of data review and puts forward development suggestions, in order to
provide valuable references for future studies of data quality control.

Key words: Data review, Scientific data, Data repository, Data journal, Data material

Sun Longhui, Liu Ziheng. Practice of and Thoughts on of Scientific Data Review[J]. Libraly Journal, 2019, 38(7): 32-36.

References

[ 1 ] 王晴.论科学数据开放共享的运行模式、保障机制及优化策略[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2014, 23(1):3-9.
[ 2 ] 涂志芳.科学数据出版的基础问题综述与关键问题识别[J]. 图书馆, 2018(6): 86-92, 100.
[ 3 ] Shaklee P, Cousijn H. Can data be peerreviewed?[EB/OL].[2018-12-20]. https: //www.elsevier.com/connect/can-data-be- peer-reviewed.
[ 4 ] Peer L, Green A. Research Data Review is GainingGround[EB/OL]. [2018-12-20]. http: //isps.yale.edu/news/ blog/2015/03/ research-data-review-isgaining-ground.
[ 5 ] 孙九林.科学数据资源与共享[J]. 中国基础科学,2003(1): 30-33.
[ 6 ] Austin C C, Bloom T, Dallmeier-Tiessen S, et al.Key components of data publishing: using currentbest practices to develop a reference model fordata publishing[J]. International Journal on DigitalLibraries, 2010: 1-16.
[ 7 ] LeMone M A, Jorgensen D P. AMS and peerr e v i e w [ E B / O L ] . 3 8 t h C o n f . o n B r o a d c a s tMeteorology, Miami, http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/171923.pdf, 2010.
[ 8 ] American Geophysical Union. Earth and spacescience data should be widely accessible in multipleformats and long-term preservation of data is anintegral responsibility of scientists and sponsoringinstitutions[EB/OL]. http: //www.agu.org/sci_pol/pdf/position_statements/, 1997.
[ 9 ] Borgman C L. Scholarship in the digital age:Information, infrastructure, and the internet[M].Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 2007: 137.
[10] Chris Graf. How and Why We’re Making ResearchData More Open[EB/OL]. [2018-12-20]. https: //hub.wiley.com/community/exchanges/discover/blog/2018/11/06/how-and-why-we-re-makingresearch-data-more-open?referrer= exchanges.
[11] Expert Views.如果如何面对再现性危机?[EB/OL].[2018-12-20]. https: //www.enago.cn/academy/ruhe-mian-dui-zai-xian-xing-wei-ji/.
[12] 张闪闪, 刘晶晶, 顾立平, 等. 科研数据内容重用中的权益问题研究[J]. 图书情报知识, 2018(1):105-113, 94.
[13] 顾立平. 数据治理——图书馆事业的发展机遇[J].中国图书馆学报, 2016, 42(5): 40-56.
[14] Callaghan S, Donegan S, Pepler S, et al. Makingdata a first class scientific output: Data citationand publication by NERC’s environmental datacentres[J]. International Journal of Digital Curation,2012, 7(1): 107-113.
[15] WHO. Data Quality Review(DQR)Toolkit[EB/OL].[2018-12-20]. http: //www.who.int/healthinfo/tools_data_analysis/dqr_modules/en/.
[16] 屈宝强, 王凯. 数据出版视角下的科学数据同行评议[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2017, 36(10): 71-77.
[17] NASA PDS. The peer review process[EB/OL]. [2018-12-20]. http: //pds.nasa.gov/tools/peerreviews.shtml.[18] Research Data Canada. Data repository[EB/OL].
[2018-12-20]. https: //www.rdc-drc.ca/glossary/original-rdc-glossary/.
[19] Dryad.Policies-curation[EB/OL]. [2018-12-20].http: //www.datadryad.org/pages/policies#curation.
[20] 刘晶晶 , 顾立平 . 数据期刊的政策调研与分析——以Scientific Data为例[J]. 中国科技期刊研究, 2015, 26(4): 331-339.
[21] 雷秋雨, 马建玲. 数据期刊的出版模式与发展研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2015(1): 112-116.
[22] 王丹丹. 数据论文: 数据集独立出版与共享模式研究[J]. 情报资料工作, 2015, 36(5): 94-97.
[23] 马瀚青, 杨小梅, 侯春梅, 等. 数据论文联合出版模式及数据论文出版[J]. 中国科技期刊研究,2018, 29(7): 698-703.
[24] Biodiversity Data Journal. About[EB/OL].[2018-12-20]. https: //bdj.pensoft.net/about
[25] 吴蓉, 顾立平, 刘晶晶. 国外学术期刊数据政策的调研与分析[J]. 图书情报工作, 2015, 59(7): 99-105.[26] PNAS. Editorial & Journal Policies[EB/OL]. [2018-12-20]. https: //www.pnas.org/page/authors/journalpolicies.

[1]	Yu Haiyan, Lin Xiaowen (School of Economics and Management, East China Normal University). An Empirical Study of Factors Influencing Geoscience Data Reuse from the Perspective of Data Quality Characteristics: A Comparative Analysis of Three Scientific Data Platforms [J]. Libraly Journal, 2024, 43(402): 29-40.
[2]	Yu Haiyan, Jiang Shenyu, Zhu Weiqi (School of Economics and Management, East China Normal University). Research on the Influencing Factors of Scientific Data Reuse in the Field of Machine Learning Based on Information Adoption Model [J]. Libraly Journal, 2024, 43(402): 5-15.
[3]	Zong Qianqian (School of Humanities, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine). Research on Intellectual Property Protection Mechanism ofScientific Data Sharing and Utilization [J]. Libraly Journal, 2024, 43(397): 42-51.
[4]	Qi Yun, He Lin (School of Information Management, Nanjing Agricultural University). Research on the Current Situation of Data Management and Sharing Platform of Humanities and Social Sciences: A Comparative Perspective at Home and Abroad [J]. Libraly Journal, 2023, 42(388): 110-123.
[5]	Du Pingping, Li Yuke, Zhang Xueyuan ( Library of China University of Mining and Technology, Department of Cultural Management, Shanghai Publishing and Printing College). Research on Conceptual Domain and Management Boundary of Data Set in China’s Measures for Scientific Data#br# Management [J]. Libraly Journal, 2022, 41(4): 96-105.
[6]	Tao Rui, Ye Jiyuan (School of Information Management, Nanjing University). Scientific Data Citation: Sources, Problems, and Research Trends [J]. Libraly Journal, 2022, 41(11): 19-29.
[7]	Tu Zhifang, Liu Ziheng. A Research on the Best Practices of Multidisciplinary Data Publishing Quality Control in China [J]. Libraly Journal, 2020, 39(9): 70-77.
[8]	Du Yuxiao, Gong Cheng, Fu Anna, Wang Dongwei, Yin Shenqin, Zhang Jilong. Research on Harvard Datatags System and Its Inspiration for China [J]. Libraly Journal, 2019, 38(8): 17-26.
[9]	Li Yang, Wen Liangming. Scientific Data Outflow in China: Phenomena, Problems and Countermeasures [J]. Libraly Journal, 2019, 38(12): 72-81.
[10]	Cui Yan. Study on Research Funding Agencies in the Process of Scientific Data Opening [J]. Libraly Journal, 2017, 36(7): 25-36.
[11]	Qu Baoqiang, Wang Kai. Peer Review of Scientific Data in the Data Publication Environment [J]. Libraly Journal, 2017, 36(10): 71-77.
[12]	Wang Haibiao, Wei Junchao. The Key Factors of Scientific Data Management: Scientific Data Management Practices and Inspiration in the University of Edinburgh [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2017, 36(1): 20-26.
[13]	Liu Chuanxi. Research on Concept of Data Papers and Peer Review [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2016, 35(9): 76-80.
[14]	Zhang Jingbei, Ren Shuhuai. Studies on Data Quality Control of Data Repository Abroad [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2016, 35(11): 38-44.
[15]	Fu Anna, Zhang Jilong, Yin Shenqin. DSA and Its Inspiration to the Development of Trustworthy Certification and Standards for Scientific Data Sharing in China [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2016, 35(10): 69-76.