Analysis of Differences between Chinese and Foreign Institutional Repositories

Abstract

Abstract:

Through case study of Chinese and foreign institutional repositories, the paper points out the big difference between Chinese and foreign institutional repositories in terms of concept, policy, fund management, software functions, construction mode, operation efficiency, publishing evaluation and service orientation, thus making clear the development direction of institutional repository. It hopes to build a new generation of institutional repository that meets the demand of the Chinese characteristics, and provides supportive services for teaching and research. It wishes to provide a good reference for discipline construction, teaching evaluation, talent evaluation, research performance and decision-making analysis, and to help truly realize the transformation from the collection type to the knowledge, service-oriented institutional repository.

Key words: Institutional Repository (IR), Open access, Digital publishing, Research support service

Yin Fangping, Wang Simin. Analysis of Differences between Chinese and Foreign Institutional Repositories[J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2015, 34(6): 43-47.

References

[ 1 ] Registry of Open Access Repositories. Charts and Graphs[DB/OL]. [2014-08-31]. http: //roar. eprints. org/cgi/roar_graphic？cache = 3006841.

[ 2 ] OpenDOAR. Search or Browse for Repositories[DB/ OL] . [2014-08-31]. http: //www. opendoar. org/find. php.

[ 3 ] 张冬荣. 机构知识库建设[EB/OL]. [2014-07- 22]. http: //wenku. baidu. com/link？url = nWnxK11qBL3KQ7HRA_ OZrBj-8jl9iQmoN2DXx2Q5 TdQjRKsuO0ZjWpBJ1rQN4QRqmPRpHDKE8pR0 Gocg16Z29cOUcQ4eZ4cJcE-MaJZPKG.

[ 4 ] MITlibraries. About DSpace@MIT[EB/OL]. [2014- 07-24]. http: //libguides. mit. edu/dspace.

[ 5 ] DOAJ[DB/OL]. [2014-07-24]. http: //doaj. org/.

[ 6 ] 张晓林, 李麟, 刘细文, 等. 开放获取学术信息资源: 逼近“主流化”转折点[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012(9): 42-47.

[ 7 ] 王秀华. 爱尔兰高等教育部要求实行强制性自存储政策[J]. 图书情报工作动态, 2008(8):12-13.

[ 8 ] 中国科学院机构知识库. 中国科学院和国家自然科学基金委发布开放获取政策[EB/OL]. [2014- 07-25]. http: //www. irgrid. ac. cn/note. jsp.

[ 9 ] 王佳佳. Arxiv与国内预印本系统的比较研究[J]. 科技情报开发与经济, 2011, 21(27):104-107.

[10] OpenDOAR. Search or Browse for Repositories[DB/ OL]. [2014-09-01]. http: //www. opendoar. org/find. php？p = 87&step = 20&format = summary&sort = r. rOaiBaseUrl + DESC%2Cr. rName.

[11] 中国科学院. 中国科学院机构知识库网格[DB/ OL]. [2014-07-25]. http: //www. irgrid. ac. cn/.

[12] 西安交通大学图书馆. 西安交通大学机构知识门户[DB/OL]. [2014-07-25]. http: //202.117. 24. 56/ jspui/index. do.

[13] 江苏大学图书馆. 江苏大学机构知识库[DB/OL]. [2014-07-25]. http: //ir. ujs. edu. cn/.

[14] 浙江大学图书与信息中心&浙江大学出版社. 浙江大学机构知识库与数字出版[DB/OL]. [2014- 07-25]. http: //www. zjupress. com/irdp/common/ index. action.

[15] 厦门大学图书馆. 厦门大学学术典藏库[DB/OL]. [2014-07-25]. http: //dspace. xmu. edu. cn/dspace/.

[16] 万文娟, 吴高. 国内外机构知识库建设现状比较研究[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2010(4): 31-35.

[17] 张凤梅, 陈能. 旅游院校五星联盟机构知识库建设模式研究[J]. 图书馆学研究, 2014(8): 86-88, 75.

[18] 郝振省. 2010-2011中国数字出版产业报告[EB/ OL]. [2014-07-25]. http: //wenku. baidu. com/view/ c496a58a680203d8ce2f2471. html.

[19] Open Access Repository Operational Statuses. Worldwide[EB/OL][2014-09-01]. http: //www. opendoar. org/onechart. php？cID = &ctID = &rtID = &clID = &lID = &potID = &rSoftWareName = &search = &groupby = os. osHeading&orderby = Tally%20DESC&charttype = pie&width = 600&height = 300&caption = Open Access Repository Operational Statuses-Worldwide.

[20] 钱建立.“服务型”机构知识库从“祠堂”进化为“书房”[EB/OL] . [2014-07-24]. http: //lib. notefirst. com/techlibrary/17948/default. aspx.

[21] arXiv. org. Print archive[DB/OL]. Cornell University Library, 2014-07-24[2014-07-24]. http: //arxiv. org.

[22] Help Table of Contents. 2013 Institutional arXiv Usage Data. [DB/OL]. Cornell University Library, [2014-07- 24]. http: //arxiv. org/help/support/2013_usage.

[23] 刘银华, 王瑰玮. 基于arXiv平台的仓储论文实证分析[J]. 现代情报, 2013, (2):155-158.

[24] MIT Libraries. MIT Open Access Publishing Fund[EB/OL] . [2014-07-24]. http: //libraries. mit. edu/scholarly/mit-open-access/open-access-atmit/ mit-open-access-publishing-fund/.

[25] SPARCA. About us[EB/OL]. [2014-07-25]. http: // www. sparc. arl. org/about.

[26] Andrew Richard Albanese. 机构知识库: 跳出“盒子”来思考——2008年机构知识库成为国内关注焦点, 而如今呢？[J]. 熊瑞, 编译. 图书情报工作动态, 2009(5):17-19.

[27] 何琳. 我国开放获取发展现状和建设策略研究 [J]. 图书情报工作, 2009(1): 52-55, 92.

[28] 张晓林. 机构知识库的发展趋势与挑战[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014(2):1-6.

[29] 张晓林. 开放获取、开放知识——3O会聚与研究图书馆范式再转变[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2014(4):1-7.

[1]	Su Liting1, Wang Jingwen2, Gao Yujie3 (1 Jitang College of North China University of Science and Technology, 2 North China University of Science and Technology Library, 3 North China University of Science and Technology Retirement Office). Research Progress and Development Trajectory of International Bibliotherapy: A Data Analysis Based on Open Access Platforms [J]. Libraly Journal, 2025, 44(408): 21-31.
[2]	Wang Xi (School of Archaeology and Museology, Peking University). Status Quo, Hot Spots and Trends of Knowledge Service Research in China: Based on CSSCI Journal Papers [J]. Libraly Journal, 2024, 43(400): 88-96.
[3]	Sheng Xiaoping, Chen Yifan, Sun Qianqian ( School of Cultural Heritage and Informa¬tion Management, Shanghai University, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute). UNESCO’s Open Science Policy and Its Enlightenment [J]. Libraly Journal, 2024, 43(396): 63-72.
[4]	Wu Jianzhong (University of Macau Library). What Will Libraries Look Like in the Next Twenty Years? [J]. Libraly Journal, 2023, 42(391): 4-9.
[5]	Zhang Yi, Chen Dan (East China Normal University Library). Investigation and Analysis of Special Collections of 100 Famous University Libraries in the World [J]. Libraly Journal, 2023, 42(385): 71-81.
[6]	Xu Jingjing, Lu Naxin, Ge Hongmei ( Institute of Medical Information & Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, National Science Library, Chinese Academy of Sciences). The Practice of Selecting and Cataloging Open Access Periodicals in Medical Libraries: Taking the Library of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences as an Example [J]. Libraly Journal, 2022, 41(8): 55-61.
[7]	Chen Wenjuan, Ye Jiyuan ( School of Information Management, Nanjing University, Library of Henan University of Economics and Law). Crisis and Innovation: The Road to Survival and Development of the American Library Consortia [J]. Libraly Journal, 2022, 41(8): 37-47.
[8]	Ding Jingda, Tang Sijia, Li Changzhi (School of Cultural Heritage and Information Management, Shanghai University). The Role Evolution of Users in Scholarly Communication under the Background of Open Access [J]. Libraly Journal, 2022, 41(6): 40-45.
[9]	Tian Xiaodi (Beijing Normal University Library). Elements Analysis of the Negotiation of Open AccessTransformative Agreement between University of CaliforniaSystem Library and Elsevier and Its Implications [J]. Libraly Journal, 2022, 41(11): 85-93.
[10]	Liu Yueru, He Huifen, Guo Limin . Open Access Publication in German University Libraries [J]. Libraly Journal, 2021, 40(5): 27-35.
[11]	Dai Xing (Guangzhou University Library). Plan S and Transformative Agreements: Progress, Challenge and Enlightenment [J]. Libraly Journal, 2021, 40(12): 108-118.
[12]	Miura Kanji . Digitalization and Open Access to Local Materials by Public Libraries in Japan: The Present Situation and Challenges [J]. Libraly Journal, 2020, 39(3): 133-137.
[13]	. Status Analysis of Open Access Journals in China and Countermeasures of the Library [J]. Libraly Journal, 2019, 38(2): 64-68.
[14]	Zhao Xing, Li Shuning, Xiao Ya’nan . The Construction of Prosopography Database based on Multisource Data Fusion from the Perspective of Digital Humanities: Taking Shanghai Library’s 2018 Open Data Application Development Competition Work “Great Educator of the 20th Century in China” as an Example [J]. Libraly Journal, 2019, 38(12): 45-51.
[15]	Zhang Lihua. Study on the Self-Built Database of Open Access Full-Text Journals: With a Focus on Sources and Acquisition of Journals [J]. Libraly Journal, 2018, 37(2): 47-52.