Research on the History and Current Situation of Academic Exchange

Abstract

Abstract: With the rapid development of the Internet and open science, the environment and mode of
academic exchange are constantly changing. It is necessary to analyze the history and current situation of
the field in order to improve the policy and efficiency of academic exchange. This paper utilizes citation
analysis and text analysis to study the history and development status of academic exchanges. The following
conclusions are drawn: The research and development in this field has undergone three stages, which are
germination (1267-1950), preliminary development (1950-1980) and rapid development (1980-present),
with the classical literature in each stage analyzed here. In the last two decades (1996-2017), the research
topics in this field are mainly on open publishing, social media and network academics, which are closely
related and interdependent.

Key words: Academic exchange, Citation network, Historical origin literature, Citation median curve,
Research topic

Ding Jingda, Lu Ying. Research on the History and Current Situation of Academic Exchange[J]. Libraly Journal, 2019, 38(6): 15-23.

References

[ 1 ] Bhaskar M. Scholarly communication: A journeyfrom print to web[J]. Library Philosophy andPractice, 2009(12): 1-8.
[ 2 ] 丁敬达.学术社区知识交流模式研究[M]. 上海: 上海世界图书出版公司, 2013.
[ 3 ] 刘佳.基于网络的学术交流方法与模式研究[D].长春: 吉林大学, 2007.
[ 4 ] 丁敬达, 许鑫.学术博客交流特征及启示——基于交流主体、交流客体和交流方式的综合考察与实证分析[J]. 中国图书馆学报, 2015, 41(217):87-98.
[ 5 ] 丁敬达, 许鑫.论学术博客评论的质置测度功能及指标[J]. 情报学报, 2015, 34(2): 129-135.
[ 6 ] Holmberg K, Thelwall M. Disciplinary differences intwitter scholarly communication[J]. Scientometrics,2014, 101(2): 1027-1042.
[ 7 ] 王崇德.文献计量学引论[M]. 桂林: 广西师范大学出版社, 1997.
[ 8 ] 李信, 陆伟, 李旭晖.一种新兴的学科领域历史根源探究方法: RPYS[J]. 图书情报工作, 2016,60(20): 70-76.
[ 9 ] 李信, 李倩.传统文献计量与科学评价的一个补充视角: 全时间域的RPYS[J]. 图书情报知识,2017(1): 89-99.
[10] 刘丽.基于HistCite的图书馆服务领域引文脉络分析[J]. 情报科学, 2014(5): 91-96.
[11] R Bacon.Opus Majus[EB/OL]. [2018-07-03]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opus_Majus.
[12] Price D. Little science, Big science[M]. New York:Columbia University Press, 1963.
[13] Merton R K, Shapere D. The Sociology of Science:Theoretical and Empirical Investigation[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1973.
[14] Garvey W D. Communication: the essence of science:facilitating information exchange among librarians,scientists,engineers and students[M]. Oxford:Pergamon Press, 1979.
[15] McCain K W. Mapping authors in intellectual space:A technical overview[J]. Journal of the AmericanSociety for Information Science & Technology, 1990,41(6): 433-443.
[16] Almind T C, Ingwersen P.Informetric analyses onthe world wide web: methodological approachesto ‘webometrics’[J]. Journal of Documentation,1997, 53(4): 404-426.
[17] Kling R, McKim G. Not just a matter of time: Fielddifferences and the shaping of electronic media insupporting scientific communication[J]. Journal ofthe American Society for Information Science, 2000,51(14): 1306-1320.
[18] Borgman C. Scholarship in the digital age:information, infrastructure, and the Internet[J].Journal of the American Society for InformationScience and Technology, 2007, 61(3): 636-637.
[19] Gargouri Y, Hajjem C, Larivière V, et al. SelfSelectedor Mandated, Open Access IncreasesCitation Impact for Higher Quality Research[J]. PlosOne, 2010, 5(10): e13636.
[20] Zhang Y. The impact of Internet-based electronicresources on formal scholarly communication in thearea of library and information science: a citationanalysis[J]. Journal of Information Science, 1998,24(4): 241-254.
[21] Harter S P. Scholarly communication and electronicjournals: An impact study[J]. Journal of the AmericanSociety for Information Science, 1998, 49(6):507-516.
[22] Tenopir C, King D W. Reading behaviour andelectronic journals[J]. Learned Publishing, 2002,15(4): 259-265.
[23] Brown C. The evolution of preprints in the scholarlycommunication of physicists and astronomers[J].Journal of theAmerican Society for InformationScience and Technology, 2001, 52(3): 187-200.
[24] Odlyzko A. The rapid evolution of scholarlycommunication[J]. Learned Publishing, 2002, 15(1):7-19.
[25] Brown C. The role of electronic preprints in chemicalcommunication: Analysis of citation, usage, andacceptance inthe journal literature[J]. Journal ofthe American Society for Information Science andtechnology, 2003, 54(5): 362-371.
[26] Antelman K. Do open-access articles have a greaterresearch impact？[J]. College & Research Libraries,2004,65(5): 372-382.
[27] Kim J.Faculty Self-Archiving: Motivations andBarriers[J]. Journal of the American Society forInformation Science andtechnology, 2010, 61(9):1909-1922.
[28] Kling R, McKim G. Scholarly communication andthe continuum of electronic publishing[J]. Journal ofthe AmericanSociety for Information Science, 1999,50(10): 890-906.
[29] Cronin B. Hyperauthorship: A postmodernperversion or evidence of a structural shift inscholarly communicationpractices？[J]. Journal ofthe American Society for Information Science andTechnology, 2001, 52(7): 558-569.
[30] Kling R, McKim G, King A. A bit more to it:Scholarly communication forums as socio-technicalinteraction networks[J]. Journal of the AmericanSociety for Information Science and technology,2003, 54(1): 47-67.
[31] Matzat U. Academic communication and InternetDiscussion Groups: transfer of information or creation of social contacts？[J]. Social Networks,2004, 26(3): 221-255