Peer Review of Scientific Data in the Data Publication Environment

Abstract

Abstract:

Scientific data peer review is one of the important means to guarantee the data quality. It has important significance for producing correct scientific results. This paper analyzes the connotation of the data peer review, analyzes its content and characteristics in various data publishing models, and summarizes the influence factors, time selection, tools, process and other elements of data peer review.

Key words: Scientific data, Data sharing, Data publication, Peer review

Qu Baoqiang, Wang Kai. Peer Review of Scientific Data in the Data Publication Environment[J]. Libraly Journal, 2017, 36(10): 71-77.

References

[1] Pashler H, Harris CR.Is the replicability crisisoverblown? three arguments examined[J]. PerspectPsychol Sci, 2012, 7(6): 531-536.

[2] Cyranoski D. Acid-bath stem-cell study underinvestigation[EB/OL]. [2014-08-04] http://www.nature.com/news/acid-bath-stem-cell-studyunder-investigation-1.14738.

[3] Collins FS, Tabak LA. Policy: NIH plans to enhancereproducibility[J]. Nature, 2014, 505(7485): 612-613.

[4] Van Panhuis. A systematic review of barriers to datasharing in public health[J]. BMC Public Health,2014(14):1144.

[5] Cinkosky M J, Fickett J W, Gilna P, et al. Electronicdata publishing and GenBank.[J]. Science (NewYork, N.Y.), 1991, 252(5010): 1273-1277.

[6] Tw B, Gazis R, Cabezas P, et al. Lost branches on thetree of life. [J]. Plos Biology, 2013, 11(9): e1001636.

[7] Callaghan S, Pepler S, Gadian A, et al. OverlayJournals and Data Publishing in the MeteorologicalSciences[J]. Ariadne, 2009(60): 1-8.

[8] Lawrence B, Jones C, Matthews B, et al. Citationand Peer Review of Data: Moving Towards FormalData Publication[J]. International Journal of DigitalCuration, 2011, 6(2): 4-37.

[9] Mayernik M S, Callaghan S, Tedds J, et al. PeerReview of Datasets: When, Why, and How[J].Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,2015, 96(8): 910-914.

[10] Parsons M A, Duerr R, Minster J. Data Citationand Peer Review[J]. Eos Transactions AmericanGeophysical Union, 2010, 91(34): 297-298.

[11] Borgman C L. Scholarship in the digital age:Information, infrastructure, and the internet[M].Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 2007:137.

[12] American Geophysical Union. Earth and spacescience data should be widely accessible in multipleformats and long-term preservation of data is anintegral responsibility of scientists and sponsoringinstitutions[EB/OL]. http://www.agu.org/sci_pol/pdf/position_statements/, 1997.

[13] LeMone M A, Jorgensen D P. AMS and peerr e vi e w[ E B/O L] . 3 8t h C o nf . o n B r o a d c a stMeteorology, Miami, http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/171923.pdf, 2010.

[14] Kriegeskorte N, Walther A, Deca D. An emergingconsensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for thefuture of scientific publishing[J]. Frontiers inComputational Neuroscience, 2012, 6(2): 46-52.

[15] Hunter J. Post-publication peer review: Opening upscientific conversation[J]. Frontiers in ComputationalNeuroscience, 2012, 6(2): 63.

[16] 何琳, 常颖聪. 国内外科学数据出版研究进展[J].图书情报工作, 2014, 58(5): 104-110.

[17] 吴立宗, 王亮绪, 南卓铜, 等. 科学数据出版现状及其体系框架[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2013, 28(3):383-390.

[18] 雷秋雨, 马建玲. 数据期刊的出版模式与发展研究[J]. 图书与情报, 2015 (1): 112-116.

[19] Reviewe r guidelines fo r the Bulletin of theAmerican Meteorological Society (BAMS). AmericanMeteorological Society[EB/OL]. http://www2.ametsoc.org/ams/index.cfm/publications/editorsand-reviewers/reviewer-guidelines-bulletin-forbams/.

[20] Nicholas K A, Gordon W S. A quick guide to writinga solid peer review[J]. Eos Transactions AmericanGeophysical Union, 2011, 92(28): 233-234.

[21] Andreas Hense.Acquiring High Quality ResearchData[J]. D-Lib Magazine, 2011, 17(1-2).

[22] Center for Research Libraries (U.S.) and OCLC.Trustworthy repositories audit & certification (TRAC)criteria and checklist[M]. Center for ResearchLibraries; OCLC Online Computer Library Center,Inc Chicago: Dublin, Ohio. 2007.

[23] Quadt F, Düsterhus A, H02ck H, et al. Atarrabi - AWorkflow System for the Publication of EnvironmentalData[J]. Data Sci J, 2012(11): 89-109.

[24] Grootveld M, Van Egmond J. Peer-reviewed openresearch data: Results of a pilot[J]. Int J DigitalCuration, 2012, 7(2): 81-91.

[25] LeMone M A, Jorgensen D P. AMS and peerreview[EB/OL]. http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/171923.pdf, 2010 .

[26] Pampel H, Pfeiffenberger H, Schäfer A, et al.Report on peer review of research data in scholarlycommunication[EB/OL]. http://epic.awi.de/30353/1/APARSEN-DEL-D33_1A-01-1_0.pdf.

[27] Lock S, Smith J. What do peer reviewers do?[J].

屈宝强王凯：数据出版视角下的科学数据同行Journal of the American Medical Association, 1990,263(10): 1341-1343.

[28] Golden M, Schultz D M. Quantifying the volunteer effortof scientific peer reviewing[J]. Bulletin of the AmericanMeteorological Society, 2012, 93(3): 337-345.

[29] Mayernik M S, Callaghan S, Tedds J, et al. PeerReview of Datasets: When, Why, and How[J].Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society,2015, 96(8): 910-914.

[30] Callaghan S. Data without Peer: Examples of DataPeer Review in the Earth Sciences[J]. D-LibMagazine, 2015, 21(1/2).

[31] Callaghan S, Donegan S, Pepler S, et al. Makingdata a first class scientific output: Data citationand publication by NERC’s environmental datacentres[J]. International Journal of Digital Curation,2012, 7(1): 107-113.

[32] NASA PDS. The peer review process[EB/OL].[2015-07-15]. http://pds.nasa.gov/tools/peerreviews.shtml.

[33] Costello M J, Michener W K, Gahegan M, et al.Biodiversity data should be published, cited, andpeer reviewed[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2013, 28(8): 454-461.