R&D Performance Evaluation of Universities in Heilongjiang Province

Abstract

Abstract: Based on Science and Technology Statistical Data Colleges and Universities 2017 and 2017
China University Evaluation Report, and following the logic of “input - output - benefit”, the paper analyses
the data regarding the input and output of scientific research by colleges and universities of Heilongjiang
Province. Using human resources, research budget, and research projects as input index, whereas scientific
and technological achievements, technology transfer, and awards as output indicators, it conducts an data
envelopment analysis (DEA) of the scientific research data.

Key words: R&D performance evaluation, Data envelopment analysis (DEA), University of HeilongjiangProvince

Liu Changqing, Zhang Lin, Dong Ying, Zhang Wei, Wang Airong. R&D Performance Evaluation of Universities in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Libraly Journal, 2019, 38(8): 74-79.

References

[ 1 ] International Organization for Standardization.Information and documentation - Internationallibrary statistics: ISO 2789: 2013 [S]. Switzerland:ISO, 2013: 4-16.
[ 2 ] International Organization for Standardization.Information and documentation - Libraryperformance indicators: ISO 11620: 2014 [S].Switzerland: ISO, 2014: 17-20.
[ 3 ] COUNTER. COUNTER CODE OF PRACTICE:RELEASE 5[OL]. [2018-08-08]. https://www.projectcounter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Release5_20171107.pdf.
[ 4 ] Brophy P. Electronic library performance indicators:the EQUINOX Project[J]. Serials, 2006, 14(1): 5-9.
[ 5 ] Blixrud J C. Measures for Electronic Use: The ARLE-Metrics Project[M]// Statistics in Practice -Measuring & Managing. Loughborough: IFLASatellite Conference, 2002: 73-84.
[ 6 ] Conyers A, Lambert J. The Journal Usage StatisticsPortal (JUSP): delivering usage data throughcollaboration[J]. Serials, 2011, 24(2): 178-182.
[ 7 ] Sutton S. A Model for Electronic Resources ValueAssessment[J]. Serials Librarian, 2013, 64(1-4):245-253.
[ 8 ] Virginia Kinman. E-Metrics and Library Assessmentin Action[J]. Journal of Electronic ResourcesLibrarianship, 2009, 21(1): 15-36.
[ 9 ] Timms G. Gathering, Evaluating, and CommunicatingStatistical Usage Information for ElectronicResources[M]// Managing Electronic Resources: ALITA Guide. 2012: 89-119.
[10] Walker M. E-Resource Statistics: What to DoWhen You Have No Money[J]. Journal of ElectronicResources Librarianship, 2009, 21(3-4): 237-250.
[11] 肖珑, 李浩凌, 徐成. CALIS数字资源评估指标体系及其应用指南[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2008,26(3): 2-8, 17.
[12] 肖珑, 张宇红. 电子资源评价指标体系的建立初探[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2002, 20(3): 38-45, 94.
[13] 向英明, 谭艺曼, 林欢. 电子资源综合评价指标体系及其数学模型的研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2004,23(1): 26-29.
[14] 徐革. 重构电子资源综合评价指标的主成分分析法[J]. 图书情报工作, 2004, 48(2): 32-34.
[15] 徐革. 电子资源评价之重要影响因子的调查研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2006, 24(3): 78-81, 96.
[16] 赵睿杰. 电子资源全程评价指标体系及综合评价模型构建[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2006.
[17] 余昭芬, 黄德斌, 汤艺, 等. GAP理论模型在数字资源绩效评价中的应用[J]. 大学图书馆学报,2013, 31 (4): 62-68.
[18] 刘军, 莫利江, 吴朗, 等. 电子资源综合评价指标体系的构建探讨[J]. 情报杂志, 2010, 29(S1):135-137.
[19] 唐琼. 采用因子分析法构建数字资源选择标准体系[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2011, 29(2): 56-63.
[20] Centre for Science and Technology Studies.SNIP indicator[OL]. [2018-08-08]. http://www.journalindicators.com/.
[21] 南京昆虫软件有限公司. ERS电子资源绩效分析平台[OL]. [2018-08-08]. http://ers.addup.com.cn/.
[22] 和媛媛, 巩在武. 基于模糊多属性决策的高校图书馆电子资源服务绩效评价研究[J]. 情报科学,2011, 29(3): 412-415, 420.
[23] 贾洁, 彭奇志. 基于BP神经网络的图书馆电子资源质量评价研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2010, 54 (21):84-87, 79.
[24] 王一华. 数据库绩效评估实证研究[J]. 情报科学,2016, 34(6): 82-86.
[25] 汪媛, 赖茂生. 我国高校图书馆引进网络版全文数据库的综合评价模型[J]. 情报科学, 2004,22(9): 1061-1065.
[26] 汪媛, 赖茂生. 网络版全文数据库综合评价模型的测试应用分析[J]. 情报科学, 2005, 23(7):1076-1084.
[27] 张彬. 外文电子期刊全文数据库评价模型[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2007.
[28] 刘爽. 基于熵权法与TOPSIS模型的高校图书馆电子资源绩效评价实证研究[D]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学,2016.
[29] 刘爽. 高校图书馆电子资源绩效评价指标体系构建研究[J]. 情报探索, 2017, 1(4): 6-10.
[30] 周艳, 蒲筱哥. 熵权TOPSIS模型在数据库绩效评价中的应用研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(8):36-41.
[31] 蒲筱哥, 刘礼明. 数据库绩效的变异系数与灰色关联度分析及实证研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014,58(14): 71-78.
[32] 蒲筱哥, 乔亚铭, 胡亚敏. 基于网络分析法的高校图书馆电子资源服务绩效评价模型及实证研究[J]. 大学图书馆学报, 2014, 32(4): 41-49.
[33] 贺梅萍. 图书馆数字资源评价指标权重赋值方法概述[J]. 现代情报, 2016, 36(10): 68-73.
[34] 徐革. 确定电子资源评价指标模糊权重的可行方法[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2006, 29(6): 690-693.
[35] 骆正清, 杨善林. 层次分析法中几种标度的比较[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2004, 24(9): 51-60

R&D Performance Evaluation of Universities in Heilongjiang Province

PDF(CN)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments