图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (409): 4-19.

• 特别策划 •    下一篇

新形势 新目标 新动能:图书馆"十五五"规划纵横谈

吴建中(中国图书馆学会学术研究委员会)程焕文(中山大学)夏立新(华中师范大学)李岩松(上海外国语大学)沙勇忠 赵发珍(兰州大学)金兼斌(清华大学)董有明(武汉大学)程金华(上海交通大学)刘宏伟(哈尔滨工业大学)   

  • 出版日期:2025-05-15 发布日期:2025-05-28
  • 作者简介:吴建中(中国图书馆学会学术研究委员会)程焕文(中山大学)夏立新(华中师范大学)李岩松(上海外国语大学)沙勇忠 赵发珍(兰州大学)金兼斌(清华大学)董有明(武汉大学)程金华(上海交通大学)刘宏伟(哈尔滨工业大学)

New Situations, New Goals, New Momentum: Insights intothe “15th Five-Year Plan” for Libraries

Wu Jianzhong (Academic Research Committee, Library Society of China)Cheng Huanwen (Sun Yat-sen University)Xia Lixin (Central China Normal University)Li Yansong (Shanghai International Studies University)Sha Yongzhong, Zhao Fazhen (Lanzhou University)Jin Jianbin (Tsinghua University)Dong Youming (Wuhan University)Cheng Jinhua (Shanghai Jiao Tong University)Liu Hongwei (Harbin Institute of Technology)   

  • Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-28
  • About author:

    Wu Jianzhong (Academic Research Committee, Library Society of China)Cheng Huanwen (Sun Yat-sen University)Xia Lixin (Central China Normal University)Li Yansong (Shanghai International Studies University)Sha Yongzhong, Zhao Fazhen (Lanzhou University)Jin Jianbin (Tsinghua University)Dong Youming (Wuhan University)Cheng Jinhua (Shanghai Jiao Tong University)Liu Hongwei (Harbin Institute of Technology)

摘要:

吴建中指出“十五五”时期,大学图书馆应重点思考和解决3 大问题:一是通过加强学习型社会数字基础设施建设,适应数字化转型;二是图书馆需做好准备,推动开放科学并将其作为教育强国建设的重要内容;三是图书馆应从数字素养、数字资源和数字基础设施建设等方面发力,抓住教育数字化新机遇,推进教育高质量发展。程焕文认为高校图书馆要实现“双一流”发展目标和高等教育的高质量发展,必须坚持成为高校知识中心、学习中心和文化中心的战略方向:把知识资源建设作为长期战略规划的重中之重,强化知识中心核心地位;探索数字时代学习新范式,创新学习中心发展模式;丰富文化中心发展内涵;探索并实现高校图书馆的智慧图书馆建设路径。夏立新认为“十五五”期间,高校图书馆亟须通过数字化转型实现从“知识中心”到“智慧中枢”的范式跃迁,从重建数字原住民时代的文献资源保障体系、重塑人工智能支撑的智慧服务体系、重构虚实结合的未来学习空间生态3 方面构建支撑未来教育创新的新型保障体系。李岩松指出在“十五五”即将到来之际,上海外国语大学图书馆必须紧密围绕学校的发展战略,以共享响应师生需求,以协作推动学校“跨通融”发展,以创新同频社会发展,通过优化资源配置、创新服务模式、打造多元空间,有力地支持学校核心要点的落地实施,促进学校整体发展。沙勇忠等提出高校图书馆应从3 方面建立与高等教育数字化转型相适应的图书馆数字化战略行动:一是通过数字资源生态化,打破资源孤岛;二是通过智慧服务创新,用AI 赋能服务新生态;三是要重视安全与伦理治理,平衡技术便利与风险防范,确保数字化转型安全可控。金兼斌指出高等教育组织和人才培养模式的变化、数智技术带来知识生产和知识传播方式的变化、开放科学趋势与地缘政治博弈背景下的机构知识库建设是影响“十五五”期间大学图书馆发展的重要因素或变量。针对这些变化,介绍了清华大学图书馆在智慧服务、学科赋能、资源建设等方面作出的前瞻性布局和规划。董有明提出在“十五五”时期,武汉大学图书馆将通过“需求牵引—技术驱动—生态重构”三位一体的转型路径,从资源聚合与发现、科研支持、教学培训、决策支持、AI 伦理风险防控等方面出发,构建覆盖学科建设全要素、科研创新全链条、管理决策全流程的智能化学科服务体系。程金华结合上海交通大学图书馆的实际情况,提出依托系统新基座和数据大平台,在教育、科技和人才3 大领域提供新型的高质量知识服务,是大学图书馆在“十五五”期间的重要使命和任务,也是实现“图书馆是大学的心脏2.0”的重要契机。刘宏伟指出高校图书馆应从大学图书馆亟需回归大学属性、大学图书馆可持续发展要闭环、大学图书馆应构建新发展格局、大学图书馆服务必须深度转型4 个方面积极应变、主动求变,通过“资源高效配置—服务效能革命—品牌全域渗透”三阶跃迁,从“资源提供者”进化为世界一流大学建设中最有力的“学术生态赋能者”。

Abstract:

Wu Jianzhong emphasized that during the “15th Five-Year Plan” period, university librariesshould focus on three major issues: adapting to digital transformation through the enhancement of digitalinfrastructure for a learning society; preparing to promote open science as a key component in buildingan educational powerhouse; and seizing new opportunities in education digitization by advancing digitalliteracy, resources, and infrastructure to support high-quality educational development. Cheng Huanwenasserted that, to achieve the “Double First-Class” initiative and high-quality development in highereducation, academic libraries must strategically position themselves as the knowledge, learning, andcultural centers of universities. This involves prioritizing knowledge resource development, exploringnew learning paradigms in the digital age, enriching the cultural center’s connotation, and establishingpathways for smart library development. Xia Lixin argued that during the “15th Five-Year Plan”,university libraries urgently need to transition from “knowledge centers” to “intelligent hubs” throughdigital transformation. This entails rebuilding document resource systems suited for digital natives,reshaping AI-supported intelligent service systems, and reconstructing future learning spaces that integrateboth physical and virtual elements, thus, a new type of guarantee system to support future educationalinnovations would be constructed. Li Yansong pointed out that as the “15th Five-Year Plan” approaches,the library at Shanghai International Studies University must align with the university’s strategic goals byresponding to faculty and student needs through shared services, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and aligning innovation with societal trends. Optimizing resource allocation, innovating service models,and creating diverse spaces will support the university’s core initiatives and overall development. ShaYongzhong and colleagues proposed that university libraries should adopt a digital strategy compatiblewith the digital transformation of higher education by: creating an ecosystem of digital resourcesto eliminate information silos; innovating intelligent services by leveraging AI for a new serviceecosystem; and emphasizing safety and ethical governance to balance technological convenience withrisk management and ensure a secure and controllable digital transformation. Jin Jianbin highlightedthat key factors influencing university libraries during this period include changes in higher educationstructures and talent training models, new modes of knowledge production and dissemination due todigital technologies, and the development of institutional repositories amid open science and geopoliticaltensions. He shared Tsinghua University Library’s forward-looking strategies in smart services, academicempowerment, and resource development. Dong Youming stated that Wuhan University Library willadopt a “demand-driven – technology-driven – ecosystem-reconstructed” transformation path duringthe “15th Five-Year Plan”. This path focuses on resource aggregation and discovery, research support,teaching and training, decision-making support, and AI ethics and risk control, aiming to build anintelligent academic service system that covers all elements of discipline development, the entireinnovation chain of research, and all processes of decision-making. Cheng Jinhua, based on the practicesof Shanghai Jiao Tong University Library, proposed that relying on a new system infrastructure and alarge data platform to deliver high-quality knowledge services in education, science, and talent cultivationwill be a key mission for libraries during this period. This also presents an opportunity to realize the visionof the “Library as the Heart of the University 2.0”. Liu Hongwei emphasized that university librariesshould adapt and innovate in four key areas: reaffirming their university identity, ensuring a closedloopfor sustainable development, constructing a new development paradigm, and deeply transformingservices. Through a three-phase evolution, namely, efficient resource allocation, a revolution in serviceeffectiveness, and brand-wide influence, libraries can evolve from mere resource providers to powerfulacademic ecosystem enablers in world-class universities.