Libraly Journal ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (7): 83-94.
Previous Articles Next Articles
Wang Lin, Zhu Kexin
Online:
2020-07-30
Published:
2020-07-31
Wang Lin, Zhu Kexin. The Influence of COVID-19 Infodemic on Information Behavior of College-Student Social Media Users[J]. Libraly Journal, 2020, 39(7): 83-94.
[ 1 ] 张涛甫 .“信息疫情”之下 , 我们如何应对 [EB/OL]. https://news.fudan.edu.cn/2020/0228/ c47a104189/page.htm. [ 2 ] Zarocostas J. How to fight an infodemic [EB/ OL]. Lancet, 2020 vol.395. https://www. thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140- 6736%2820%2930461-X. [ 3 ] Hao K, Basu T. The coronavirus is the first true social-media“infodemic”[EB/OL]. https://www. technologyreview.com/s/615184/the-coronavirusis-the-first-true-social-media-infodemic/. [ 4 ] 熊慧, 郭倩. 朋友圈中辍行为的影响因素研究[J]. 新闻界, 2019(10): 36-45. [ 5 ] 李丹.“SARS”危机中的谣言与恐慌[D]. 成都: 四川大学, 2004. [ 6 ] 唐登华. 新冠肺炎流行期社会心理响应建议[J/ OL]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2020(3): 238-239[2020- 04-04]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1873. r.20200310.1528.034.html. [ 7 ] 罗琳, 曾晓进, 廖欣, 等. 新冠肺炎疫情期公众疾 病认知、应对方式及锻炼行为调查[EB/OL]. 中 国公共卫生: 1-4[2020-04-04]. http://kns.cnki.net/ kcms/detail/21.1234.R.20200228.1143.004.html. [ 8 ] 蔡欢乐. 新型冠状病毒肺炎相关知识、行为和 心理应对: 基于网络的横断面调查[EB/OL]. 中国 公共卫生: 1-4[2020-04-04]. http://kns.cnki.net/ kcms/detail/21.1234.r.20200228.1002.002.html. [ 9 ] Ayyagari R, Grover V, Purvis R. Technostress: Technological antecedents and implications[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2011, 35(4): 831-858. [10] 王松, 王瑜, 李芳. 社会化电子商务情境下信息过 载对用户消极使用行为的影响——基于倦怠和 抗拒的中介[J]. 企业经济, 2019, 38(3): 50-57. [11] 顾润德. 社交媒体倦怠及用户转移行为研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2019 . [12] 张艳丰, 彭丽徽, 刘金承, 等. 新媒体环境下移动 社交媒体倦怠用户画像实证研究——基于SSO 理论的因果关系视角[J]. 情报学报, 2019, 38(10): 1092-1101. [13] Zhang Y, Liu Y, Li W, et al. A study of the influencing factors of mobile social media fatigue behavior based on the grounded theory. Information Discovery and Delivery. 2020; ahead-of-print. [14] Whelan E, Najmul Islam A K M, Brooks S. Is boredom proneness related to social media overload and fatigue? A stress-strain-outcome approach. Internet Research, 2020; ahead-of-print. [15] Dhir A, Yossatorn Y, Kaur P, et al. Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing—A study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue, anxiety and depression[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2018, 40: 141-52. [16] Koeske G F, Koeske R D. A preliminary Test of a Stress-strain-outcome model for reconceptualizing the burnout phenomenon[J]. Journal of Social Service Research, 1993, 17(34): 107-135. [17] 刘鲁川, 张冰倩, 李旭. 社交媒体信息过载、功能 过载与用户焦虑情绪的关系: 一项实验研究[J]. 信息资源管理学报, 2019, 9(2): 66-76 . [18] 韩 雪 : “ 信 息 疫 情 ” 也 需 要 防 控 [ E B / O L ] . [2020-03-02]. https://m.sohu.com/sa/377156015_9 9914864?strategyid=00014. [19] 王世伟. 略论“信息疫情”的十大特点[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2020, 39(3): 26-31. [20] 顾犇. 信息过载问题及其研究[J]. 中国图书馆学 报, 2000(5): 40-43; 74. [21] 李旭, 刘鲁川, 张冰倩. 认知负荷视角下社交媒体 用户倦怠及消极使用行为研究——以微信为例[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2018, 38(11): 94-106. [22] 黄晓朦. 个性化信息推送背后的束缚——浅析算 法时代“信息茧房”效应[J]. 传播力研究, 2019, 3(7): 235-236. [23] 刘鲁川, 李旭. 心理契约视域下社会化阅读用户 的退出、建言、忠诚和忽略行为[J]. 中国图书馆 学报, 2018, 44(4): 89-108. [24] 杨峰, 史琦, 姚乐野. 基于用户主体认知的政府社 交媒体信息质量评价——政务微博的考察[J]. 情 报杂志, 2015, 34(12): 181-185. [25] 殷晓椿. 基于新媒体的疫情谣言传播个案研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2014. [26] 袁舒婕. 战胜谣言, 媒体要更专业[N]. 中国新闻 出版广电报, 2020-03-11(002). [27] 安佳. 阻击网络疫情谣言信息提高自身“战斗力” 与“免疫力”[N]. 兰州日报, 2020-02-27(007). [28] 谭春辉, 王一君. 微信朋友圈信息分享行为影响 因素分析[J]. 现代情报, 2020, 40(2): 84-95; 102. [29] 阳长征. 危机事件中网络信息表征对用户持 续分享意愿影响研究[ J/OL]. 图书情报工作: 1-12[2020-03-17]. https://doi.org/10.13266/ j.issn.0252-3116.2019.21.011. [30] 张大勇, 许磊, 孔洪新. 社交媒体用户群体互动行 为特征研究——以微信用户群分享为例[J]. 情报 理论与实践, 2019, 42(10): 97-101; 116. [31] 周敏.“互联网+”背景下网络社交倦怠的影响因 素研究[J]. 太原城市职业技术学院学报, 2019(3): 82-83. [32] 赵宇翔, 张轩慧, 宋小康. 移动社交媒体环境下用 户错失焦虑症(FoMO)的研究回顾与展望[J]. 图书 情报工作, 2017, 61(8): 133-144. [33] 张程洁. 新媒体环境下用户社交媒体倦怠情绪与 消极行为研究[J]. 视听, 2019(4): 160-161. [34] Bright L F, Kleiser S B, Grau S L. Too much Facebook? An exploratory examination of social media fatigue[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2015, 44: 148-155. [35] 李慧. 社交媒体倦怠的影响因素研究[D]. 厦门: 厦门大学, 2018. [36] 张梅贞. 用户对网络视频情景短剧广告回避行为 影响因素研究——基于心理抗拒的视角[J]. 企业 经济, 2019, 38(11): 128-134. [37] Brehm J W. A Theory of Psychological Reactance[M]. Oxford, England: Academic Press, 1966. [38] Stephen A Rains. The Nature of Psychological Reactance Revisited: A Meta-Analytic Review[J]. Human Communication Research, 2013, 39(1): 47-73. [39] Shen L. Antecedents to Psychological Reactance: The Impact of Threat, Message Frame, and Choice[J]. Health Communication, 2015; 30(10): 975-985. [40] 万君, 郭婷婷, 吴正祥, 等. 用户对移动互联网主 动式推荐信息的心理抗拒与接受意愿研究[J]. 北 京邮电大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(5): 47-53. [41] Lee G, Lee W J. Psychological reactance to online recommendation services[J]. Information & Management. 2009, 46(8): 448-52. [42] 张艳丰, 李贺, 彭丽徽. 移动社交媒体倦怠行为 的影响因素模型及实证研究[J]. 现代情报, 2017, 37(10): 36-41. [43] 杜娟, 游静.“信息茧房”效应下消费者对个性 化推送的采纳意愿研究: 心理抗拒视角[J]. 企业 经济, 2019(1): 103-110 [44] 王艳萍, 程岩. 在线用户对弹出式广告的心理抗 拒分析[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2013, 18(1): 71-77. [45] Edwards S M, Li H, Lee J. Forced Exposure and Psychological Reactance: Antecedents and Consequences of the Perceived Intrusiveness of Pop-Up Ads[J]. Journal of Advertising: Special Issue on Advertising and the New Media, 2002, 31(3): 83-95. [46] 张文婷. 大学生对网络谣言的认知与行为研究[D]. 沈阳: 长春工业大学, 2019. [47] 成吉. 社交媒体倦怠及其成因分析[D]. 南京: 南 京大学, 2018. [48] 赵宇. 正负性情绪、从众对社会决策的影响研究[D]. 贵阳:贵州师范大学, 2018 [49] 吴峰. 探讨消极情绪产生消极行为的原因[J]. 才 智, 2018(12): 130. [50] 李旭. 信息过载背景下社交媒体用户倦怠及消极 使用行为研究[D]. 济南: 山东财经大学, 2018. [51] 李旭, 刘鲁川. 信息过载背景下社会化阅读App用 户的忽略与退出行为——心理契约违背视角[J]. 图书馆, 2018(2): 75-84. [52] 徐春雨. 感知过载对社交媒体倦怠的影响机制研 究[D]. 杭州: 浙江工商大学, 2018. [53] 陈娟, 邓胜利. 移动数字阅读App用户退出意愿 的影响因素研究[J]. 情报科学, 2017, 35(3): 128- 133; 151. [54] Zhang S, Zhao L, Lu Y, et al. Do you get tired of socializing? An empi rical explanation of discontinuous usage behaviour in social network services[J]. Information & Management, 2016, 53(7): 904-914. [55] 王素素. 大学生对互联网行为定向广告的心理抗 拒与接受意愿研究[D]. 广州: 暨南大学, 2018. [56] 邱佳青, 裴雷, 孙建军. 社交网络背景下的用户 信息屏蔽意向研究[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(11): 43-48. [57] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型——AMOS的操作与应用 [M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2009: 52-57.[58] Hair J F, Black W C, Babin B J. Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis(7th Edition) [M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2009:75. [59] 代宝, 罗蕊, 续杨晓雪. 社交媒体倦怠: 含义、前 因及后果[J]. 现代情报, 2019, 39(9): 142-150. [60] 万君, 王慧. 用户对网络社群主动式推荐信息的 心理抗拒与接受意愿研究[J]. 信息资源管理学 报, 2019, 9(3): 90-99. [61] Xie B, He D, Mercer T, et al. Global health crises are also information crises: A call to action. JASIST[EB/ OL]. 2020: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24357. [62] 胡泳. 如何纾解大规模信息恐慌?[EB/O L]. [2020-04-05]. https://www.36kr.com/p/5298914. [63] 黄 如 花 . 从 重 大 突 发 公 共 卫 生 事 件 的 应 对 谈信息素养教育的迫切性[EB/OL]. 人 民 网, [2020-03-02]. http://edu.people.com.cn/ n1/2020/0302/c1053-31612121.html?from=groupm essage&isappinstalled=0. [64] Caulfield M. Sifting through the coronavirus pandemic[EB/OL]. [2020-04-05]. https://infodemic. blog/. |
[1] | Tong Zhaojuan (Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Library) Xu Xin (Department of Information Management, Faulty of Economics and Management, East China Normal University). Hotspots of COVID-19 Information Research and the Enlightenment to China [J]. Libraly Journal, 2023, 42(383): 16-26. |
[2] | Meng Qiuqing, , Xiong Huixiang, Yang Zirong ( School of Information, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, School of Information Management, Central China Normal University). Analysis on Health Information Needs and Evolution of Internet Users in the Post-Epidemic Period [J]. Libraly Journal, 2022, 41(2): 119-127. |
[3] |
Zhang Xiaoyang, Liu Yang, Miao Song, Zhang Zhaoxia ( Jiangsu University Library, Institute of Science and Technology Information of Jiangsu University).
Dataset of User Behavior Records of Jiangsu UniversityLibrary in 2020 Academic Year [J]. Libraly Journal, 2022, 41(10): 97-103. |
[4] |
Lu Changwei, Shi Weihua, Chen Yongying ( Fudan University Library).
Research on Reading Theme Innovation and Its Promotionduring Public Health Emergencies: Taking the “Reading Life”Series Activities of Fudan University Library as an Example [J]. Libraly Journal, 2022, 41(10): 49-55. |
[5] | Li Jin, Zhang Qiu. What Did the “Double First-class” University Libraries Do during the Covid-19?——Based on the Internet Portal and WeChat Official Accoun [J]. Libraly Journal, 2021, 40(4): 77-81. |
[6] | Xiao Peng, Yao Chuhui. Sharpening the Tools: Behavioral Research on Communicating via Digital Tools in the Academic Virtual Community of Humanities [J]. Libraly Journal, 2021, 40(3): 60-68. |
[7] | Ma Le, Wu Dan. Research on the Applicability of Electronic Health Information Literacy Education Standards in Major Public Health Emergencies and Countermeasures [J]. Libraly Journal, 2020, 39(7): 95-103. |
[8] | Wang Shiwei. Ten characteristics of “Infodemic” [J]. Libraly Journal, 2020, 39(3): 19-23. |
[9] | Wei Dawei, Liao Yongxia, Ke Ping, Zhang Zhixiong, Wang Youqiang, Teng Wuxiao, Zhou Lu . Discussion on Library Emergency Services during Major Public Safety Emergencies [J]. Libraly Journal, 2020, 39(3): 4-18. |
[10] | . Research on Executives’ Risk Perception and Behavior Choice to the COVID-19 [J]. Libraly Journal, 2020, 39(12): 117-127. |
[11] | Li Qian, Xu Xin. Analysis of Digital Viability of Urban Residents during COVID-19: Based on the Citizen Survey of Shanghai [J]. Libraly Journal, 2020, 39(12): 107-116. |
[12] | . Research on the Influential Factors of Public Perception and Attitudes to the COVID-19: Based on the Citizen Survey of Shanghai [J]. Libraly Journal, 2020, 39(12): 98-106. |
[13] | Xiao Peng, Qin Xiaojie, Fang Runjing. New Needs, New Context and New Strategies in Information Literacy Education for Special Groups: Based on the Research of Important Social Issues and Interviews on Hemophilia [J]. Libraly Journal, 2017, 36(12): 61-67. |
[14] | Jiang Shan, Zhang Ning. Research on the Data in Library [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2016, 35(11): 51-55. |
[15] | Chong Lexi, Qiu Junping. Visualized Analysis of Information Behavior Study [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2015, 34(9): 49-54. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||