Comparative Analysis of Chinese Bibliographical Cataloging Rules and RDA in Terms of Description Source of Information: A Case Study of “Monograph Title and Statement of Responsibility”

Abstract

Abstract: Description source of information is the source of selecting content of the descriptive entries in
document description. There is a significant difference between Chinese Bibliographical Cataloging Rules
and RDA in terms of its regulations. RDA defines the related concepts more clearly and specifically, while
its regulations on the description information source for monograph title and statement of responsibility
also more reasonable. The author believes that Chinese cataloging should draw upon RDA, therefore.

Key words: Chinese Bibliographical Cataloging Rules, RDA, Description source of information

Xin Miao. Comparative Analysis of Chinese Bibliographical Cataloging Rules and RDA in Terms of Description Source of Information: A Case Study of “Monograph Title and Statement of Responsibility”[J]. Libraly Journal, 2019, 38(6): 39-43.

[1]	Wu Nuoman (Sichuan University Library). A Study on the Linked Datafication of Bibliography andLibrary Service Innovation from the Perspective of “Explore” [J]. Libraly Journal, 2024, 43(399): 37-44.
[2]	Cai Dan (National Library of China, Beijing). Analysis of Resource Content and Carrier Category in New RDA [J]. Libraly Journal, 2024, 43(393): 42-49.
[3]	Jin Hua (Tianjin University of Commerce Library). Research on Bibliographic Description of Literature Resources from the Perspective of Cognitive Computing [J]. Libraly Journal, 2022, 41(9): 43-51.
[4]	Wang Jingxia (Political Institute of National Defense University). The Outline of the International Resource Cataloguing Standard System in the Digital Age [J]. Libraly Journal, 2022, 41(9): 31-42.
[5]	Zhu Meihua, Wang Qiujun (Sun Yat-sen University Library). Studies on the Entities of Official RDA [J]. Libraly Journal, 2022, 41(10): 18-24.
[6]	Zheng Jiaying (Shanghai Library). Research and Practice on the Cataloging of Rare Books in Xujiahui Library of Shanghai Library [J]. Libraly Journal, 2022, 41(1): 75-81.
[7]	Zhao Kun, ( Hebei University Management College, National Library of China). The Innovative Research on RDA of Audio-Visual and Electronic Resources of the Library [J]. Libraly Journal, 2021, 40(11): 72-83.
[8]	Xin Miao (Library of Neijiang Normal University). Interpretation of Instructions on Source of Information in the New RDA [J]. Libraly Journal, 2021, 40(10): 72-78.
[9]	.Maiko Kimura. Differences between Nippon Cataloging Rules 2018 Edition and Resource Description and Access (RDA) [J]. Libraly Journal, 2020, 39(5): 100-107.
[10]	Zhu Meihua. Discussions on the Description of the Authorized Reprinted Edition of Western Language Books under RDA [J]. Libraly Journal, 2019, 38(6): 33-38.
[11]	Wang Yanqiao. The Enlightenment of Resource Description and Access (RDA) On Standardizing Chinese Names#br# [J]. Libraly Journal, 2019, 38(1): 43-47.
[12]	Wang Wei. Explorations on Resource Description and Access (RDA) in Korea and Its Enlightenment to Korean Literature Cataloging in China [J]. Libraly Journal, 2018, 37(8): 92-98.
[13]	Xin Miao. The Interpretation of Mapping Report of PCC Standard Record to BIBFRAME [J]. Libraly Journal, 2018, 37(8): 14-20.
[14]	Zhao Dandan. Changes in Bibliographic Records Induced by the Concept of Expression and Its Attributes in RDA [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2017, 36(1): 73-76.
[15]	Liu Dan, Zhang Qiangqiang. Analysis of Characteristics, Advantages and Disadvantages of LC-PCC PS [J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL, 2016, 35(5): 32-37.

Comparative Analysis of Chinese Bibliographical Cataloging Rules and RDA in Terms of Description Source of Information: A Case Study of “Monograph Title and Statement of Responsibility”

PDF(CN)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments