LIBRARY JOURNAL
Previous Articles Next Articles
Deng Fuquan
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Because the OLCC and the CUCC understanding of the ISBD rules and the CNMARC function are not the same, the two cataloging mechanisms are quite different in the statement of responsibility description. In order to make the cataloging data better reflect the ISBD rules and CNMARC format requirements, the paper recommends that the two cataloging mechanisms should jointly improve the quality and level of our bibliographic data compilation through coordination.
Key words: OLCC, CUCC, Statement of responsibility, Description difference, ISBD rules, CNMAR format
Deng Fuquan. Analysis on the Differences of Responsibility Description between OLCC and CUCC[J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.libraryjournal.com.cn/EN/
https://www.libraryjournal.com.cn/EN/Y2016/V35/I9/61
[ 1 ] http://www.nlc.gov.cn.[ 2 ] http://www.CALIS.edu.cn.[ 3 ] 国际图书馆协会和机构联合会. 国际标准书目著录(统一版)[M]. 北京: 北京图书馆出版社, 2008.[ 4 ] 国家图书馆《中国文献编目规则》修订组. 中国文献编目规则(第二版)[M]. 北京: 北京图书馆出版社, 2005.[ 5 ] 辛苗. 责任说明著录中的两个问题[J]. 国家图书馆学刊, 2008(1):71-73.[ 6 ] 国家图书馆. 新版中国机读目录格式使用手册[M]. 北京: 国家图书馆出版社, 2004.[ 7 ] 胡广翔. GB/T3792.2-2006《普通图书著录规则》应用指南[M]. 北京: 国家图书馆出版社,2011.[ 8 ] 邓福泉. 关于责任说明著录中一些问题的分析[J]. 图书馆建设, 2012(9):27-28.