LIBRARY JOURNAL
Previous Articles Next Articles
Qiao Chu
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Bibliography compiled by the government has a huge difference with that compiled by the private on writing purpose, principles and expression. Thus, we should distinguish the difference between them when we start a new research in reviewing the classical literature or analyzing the history of academic.Only by this, we can obtain more accurate answers in these fields.
Key words: Chinese classical bibliography, Bibliography compiled by the government, Bibliography compiled by the private
Qiao Chu. Comparative Study of Written Principles of Bibliography Compiled by the Government with That by the Private[J]. LIBRARY JOURNAL.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.libraryjournal.com.cn/EN/
https://www.libraryjournal.com.cn/EN/Y2016/V35/I1/104
[ 1 ] 高路明. 古籍目录与中国古代学术研究[M]. 南京:江苏古籍出版社, 2000: 291.[ 2 ] 王新才. 从会通到辨章学术考镜源流到书目控制论[J]. 图书馆, 1995(5): 13-16.[ 3 ] 张舜徽. 广校雠略[M]. 武汉: 华中师范大学出版社, 2004.[ 4 ] 汪辟疆. 目录学研究[M]. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社, 2000.[ 5 ] 叶德辉. 书林清话[M]. 北京: 燕山出版社, 1999:336-337.[ 6 ] 刘知几. 史通[M]. 上海: 上海世纪出版集团, 2013.[ 7 ] 孙从添. 藏书记要[M]//胡应麟. 经籍会通. 北京燕山出版社, 1999: 96-97.[ 8 ] 赵坦. 唐孔颖达《五经义疏》得失论[M]//钱基博.国学文选类纂. 上海古籍出版社, 2012: 95.[ 9 ] 陈旭东. 《四库全书总目》较《四库全书附存目录》书目增删及原因探析[J]. 山东图书馆学刊,2011(4): 97-102.[10] 钱基博. 国学文选类纂[M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2012: 137-138.