图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 60-70.

• 工作研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

从OPAC到GPAC:生成式人工智能重构图书馆目录系统的路径研究

郭利敏,刘悦如,付雅明   

  • 出版日期:2026-04-15 发布日期:2026-04-29
  • 作者简介:郭利敏  上海图书馆(上海科学技术情报研究所),副研究馆员。研究方向:人工智能以及新技术在图书馆的应用。作者贡献:论文框架设计、数据收集、撰写及修改。E-mail:lmguo@libnet.sh.cn 上海 200031
    刘悦如  同济大学图书馆,副研究馆员。研究方向:新技术在图书馆的应用、开放科学。作者贡献:文献调研、论文修改。 上海 200092
    付雅明 上海大学文化遗产与信息管理学院,助理研究员。研究方向:数字人文、知识组织。作者贡献:论文修改。 上海 200444

From OPAC to GPAC:  Pathways for Reconstructing Library Catalog Systems with Generative Artificial Intelligence

Guo Limin, Liu Yueru, Fu Yaming   

  • Online:2026-04-15 Published:2026-04-29
  • About author:Guo Limin, Liu Yueru, Fu Yaming

摘要: 本文在系统回顾图书馆书目系统演进历程与局限的基础上,提出面向生成式人工智能时代的新一代目录系统架构——生成式公共目录(Generative Public Access Catalog,GPAC)。该架构以“整合—理解—生成—服务”为核心逻辑,融合大语言模型、语义检索、知识图谱、智能元数据与可验证生成机制,构建基于自然语言交互、语义意图解析与知识生成的智能目录系统新范式。需要指出的是,OPAC并未被取代而是以基础能力嵌入GPAC中,成为支撑语义计算与智能服务的底层支架。论文重点分析了GPAC在语义检索与推荐服务重构、智能元数据驱动下的知识组织优化以及面向知识结构的资源采购机制等典型图书馆业务场景中的适配路径与可行性,论证其在实际应用中的可行性。研究表明,GPAC不仅是目录系统技术路径的延续,更是图书馆知识服务理念重塑与功能再定位的重要支撑,为构建智能化、可信化、协同化的下一代公共知识基础设施提供理论框架与实践方向。

关键词: 生成式人工智能, 图书馆目录系统

Abstract: Based on a systematic review of the evolution and limitations of bibliographic systems, this paper proposes a next-generation catalog architecture for the era of generative artificial intelligence—Generative Public Access Catalog(GPAC). Centered on the core logic of “Integration-Understanding-Generation-Service,” GPAC integrates large language models, semantic retrieval, knowledge graphs, intelligent metadata, and verifiable generation mechanisms to create a new paradigm of intelligent catalog system based on natural language interaction, semantic intent parsing, and knowledge generation. Importantly, OPAC has not been replaced but rather embedded within GPAC as a foundational capability, serving as the underlying infrastructure supporting semantic computation and intelligent services. This paper focuses on the adaptation pathways and feasibility of GPAC in key library service scenarios, including the reconstruction of semantic search and recommendation services, the optimization of knowledge organization driven by intelligent metadata, and resource acquisition mechanisms oriented toward knowledge structures. The study demonstrates that GPAC is not merely a continuation of technological evolution of catalog systems but also a vital foundation for reimagining the philosophy and functions of library knowledge services. It offers both a theoretical framework and practical direction for building the next generation of intelligent, trustworthy, and collaborative public knowledge infrastructure.