图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (413): 134-137.

• 书刊评荐 • 上一篇    下一篇

科学软件是科研成果评价的一个新维度———评《科学软件的智能识别与影响力测度研究》

叶继元 陶 蕊(南京大学信息管理学院)   

  • 出版日期:2025-09-15 发布日期:2025-09-29
  • 作者简介:

    叶继元 南京大学信息管理学院,教授,博士生导师。研究方向:学术规范与评价、期刊与信息资源建设、图书情报学理论与方法。作者贡献:论文思路拟定与内容修改。E-mail yejiyuan@nju. edu. cn 江苏南京 210023

    陶 蕊 南京大学信息管理学院,博士研究生。研究方向:信息资源建设、科学数据管理。作者贡献:论文写作与修改。 江苏南京 210023

Scientific Software as a New Dimension in Research Output Evaluation:A Review of Research on Intelligent Recognition and Impact Measurement of Scientific Software

Ye Jiyuan,Tao Rui (School of Information Management ,Nanjing University)   

  • Online:2025-09-15 Published:2025-09-29
  • About author:Ye Jiyuan,Tao Rui (School of Information Management ,Nanjing University)

摘要:

科学软件作为一种重要的科研成果,在现代科学研究中发挥着关键作用,但其学术价值常常被低估,导致重复开发、科研资源浪费等一系列问题。造成这些问题的原因主要有学术共同体认知不足,学术评价体系不完善等。因此,正确认识科学软件对科学研究的影响,将科学软件纳入学术评价体系,对科学软件的发展和学术评价体系的完善十分必要。由潘雪莲博士所著的《科学软件的智能识别与影响力测度研究》一书,综合运用多源数据和多元方法,系统研究了全文数据库中科学软件实体的自动识别,科学软件影响力的测量,国内外科学软件使用、引用情况和产出贡献情况等内容,为科研成果评价提供了科学软件的新视角和新观点。该书数据多源,方法合理,论证清晰,结论可信,对于科研成果评价有很好的启发性,不仅丰富了科学计量学研究内容,拓展了科学计量研究方法,而且对我国相关部门加大科学软件研发投入、明确将科学软件纳入科研成果评价体系具有重要参考意义。

关键词: 科学软件&emsp, 科研成果评价&emsp, 学术评价&emsp, 科学计量学

Abstract:

As an important research output scientific software plays a pivotal role in modern scientific research. However its academic value is often under estimated leading to a range of problems such asduplicate development and wastage of research resources. These problems mainly stem from the lack of recognition within the academic community and the imperfection of the academic evaluation system.Therefore it is necessary to correctly understand the impact of scientific software on scientific research and incorporate scientific software into the academic evaluation system. Drawing on multi-source data andmultiple methods the book Research on Intelligent Recognition and Impact Measurement of ScientificSoftware by Dr. Pan Xuelian systematically studies the automatic identification of scientific softwareentities in full-text databases the measurement of software impact and the use citation and outputcontribution of scientific software at home and abroad. It provides a new perspective and viewpoint of scientific software for research output evaluation. The book has robust data sources well-founded methods clear arguments and reliable conclusions which provides inspiration for the research output evaluation. It not only enriches the research content and methodological tools of the field but also offers important reference to relevant departments in China to increase investment in scientific software researchand development and explicitly incorporate scientific software into the evaluation system of research output.

Key words: Scientific software, Research output evaluation, Academic evaluation, Scientometrics