图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (393): 118-128.

• 专业教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

北美iSchool 院校危机信息学教育研究

张 衍 韦昱杰(上海大学文化遗产与信息管理学院)   

  • 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-01-31
  • 作者简介:张 衍 上海大学文化遗产与信息管理学院,副教授。研究方向:信息资源管理与知识服务、学科教育与学科史研究。作者贡献:选题、文章整体框架设计、文章的修改与定稿。E-mail:zy_shu@126.com 上海200444 韦昱杰 上海大学文化遗产与信息管理学院,硕士研究生。研究方向:信息资源管理与知识服务研究。作者贡献:资料收集与整理、文章初稿的撰写与修改。上海 200444

A Study of the Course of Crisis Informatics Offered by iSchools in North America

Zhang Yan, Wei Yujie (School of Cultural Heritage and Information Management, Shanghai University)   

  • Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-31
  • About author:Zhang Yan, Wei Yujie (School of Cultural Heritage and Information Management, Shanghai University)

摘要:

解决日益频发和日趋复杂的公共危机亟需危机信息管理专业人才。北美iSchool 院校在危机信息管理人才的培养上具有丰富的经验和成熟的体系,可为我国开展危机信息学教育提供参考借鉴。文章运用文献分析法和网络调查法,归纳北美iSchool 院校危机信息学教育模式,从培养目标、课程内容、教学体系、师资力量和学生就业等方面分析其教育体系。针对我国危机信息管理人才需求巨大但教育相对滞后的状态,提出把握学科变革机遇,开展危机信息管理教育;突破学科壁垒,推动多元主体协同办学;回应多维需求,丰富教育体系和教学形式;注重理论与实践结合,建立全面综合的教学、考核机制等建议。

Abstract:

Solving increasingly frequent and complex public crises need crisis information managementprofessionals. iSchools in North America have rich experience and a mature system of training talentsin crisis information management, which can provide reference for Chinese iSchools to implementcrisis informatics instructions. This paper reviewed existing studies in the literature, investigated onlineinformation provided by iSchools in North America, summarized the crisis informatics course model ofiSchools in North America, and analyzed its instruction system from the following perspectives: teachingobjectives, course content, instruction mechanisms, course outcomes, human resources in teaching, andgraduate employment rate. Given the demand for crisis information management talents in China and thelack of relative education mechanism, this paper proposes suggestions such as seizing the opportunity ofdiscipline reform and implementing crisis information management instruction, overcoming disciplinarybarriers and promoting the cooperation of multiple stakeholders, responding to multi-dimensional needs,enriching the education system and teaching forms, paying attention to the combination of theories andpractices, and establishing a comprehensive teaching and outcomes assessment mechanism.