单篇文献的引文计量指标与Altmetrics的比较分析——以ESI的Hot Papers为例

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过选取不同的数据源和分析方法探究Altmetrics文献计量方式对传统的引文计量方式的影响，以及这些计量指标如何评价单篇论文的影响力。结合ESI数据库热点文章的被引频次与Scopus平台提供的Altmetrics各项计量指标，尝试利用SPSS统计软件来分析传统的引文评价指标与Altmetrics各评价指标之间的相关性和差异性。通过研究分析发现：以引文为评价基础的ESI热点文章并不一定对应Altmetrics的高分值文献；进一步的研究从评价论文影响力的5个指标中简化为2个公因子——社交传媒因子和学术引用因子，可从不同群体对文献的不同传播利用方式来评价一篇论文的影响力；不同出版模式的文献在各评价指标上也有显著的差异。

关键词: Altmetrics, 引文计量指标, 比较分析, Scopus, ESI, 热点文章, SPSS

Abstract: By selecting the different data sources and analysis methods, this paper explores the influence
of the Altmetrics bibliomeric on traditional citation measurement method, and analyses how these indicators
evaluate the individual article. With the citation counts of papers on research hotspots from ESI database and the measurement indicators of Altmetrics from Scopus database, this paper tries analyzing the correlation and differences between traditional citation evaluation index and the measurement indexes of Altmetrics by way of SPSS. The results show that the papers under study do not necessarily obtain high Altmetrics
scores. And the further research finds that 2 main factors from 5 measurement indicators, i.e., social media factor and academic reference factor, can be sufficient to evaluate a paper’s influence by different groups using and diffusing these papers. The publication mode of literature can also differ vastly in terms of the evaluation index.

Key words: Altmetrics, Citation measurement indicators, Comparison analysis, Scopus, ESI, Papers on research hotspots, SPSS

阎雅娜聂兰渤王静. 单篇文献的引文计量指标与Altmetrics的比较分析——以ESI的Hot Papers为例[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2018, 37(3): 100-107.

Yan Yana, Nie Lanbo, Wang Jing. A Comparative Analysis of the Citation Measurement and Altmetrics Measurement of the Literature: Taking Papers on Research Hotspots from ESI as an Example[J]. Libraly Journal, 2018, 37(3): 100-107.

参考文献

[1] Pernille G. Rasmussen, Jens Peter Andersen.Altmetrics: an Alternative Perspective on Research Evaluation [J]. Sciecom Info, 2013, 9(2): 5-9.
[2] 杨思洛. 引文分析存在的问题及其原因探究[J].中国图书馆学报, 2011(3): 108-116.
[3] Scott Lapinski, Heather Piwowar, Jason Priem.Riding the Crest of the Altmetrics Wave: How librarians Can Help Prepare Faculty for the Next Generation of Research Impact metrics[J]. College &Research Libraries News, 2013, 74(6): 292-300.
[4] J Priem, D Taraborelli, P Groth, et al. Altmetrics: A manifesto, 26 October 2010. [EB/OL]. [2016-03-03]. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/.
[5] 毛鸿鹏, 张志强. Altmetrics研究综述[J]. 图书与情报, 2015(3): 134-140.
[6] 邱均平, 余厚强. 替代计量学的提出过程与研究进展[J]. 图书情报工作, 2013, 57(19): 5-12.
[7] 顾丽平. 开放数据计量研究综述:计算机网络用户行为和科学社群影响力的Altmetrics计量[J]. 现代图书情报技术, 2013(6): 1-8.
[8] 刘春丽. Web 2.0环境下的科学计量学: 选择性计量学[J]. 图书情报工作, 2012(14): 52-56.
[9] 由庆斌, 汤珊红. 补充计量学及应用前景[J]. 情报理论与实践, 2013, 36(12): 6-10.
[10] 刘丽敏, 王晴. 我国图情领域Altmetrics研究评述及展望[J]. 情报杂志, 2016(4): 131-136.
[11] 王睿, 胡文静, 郭玮. 高Altmetrics指标科技论文学术影响力研究[J]. 图书情报工作, 2014, 58(21):92-98.
[12] 赵蓉英, 郭凤娇, 谭洁. 基于Altmetrics的学术论文影响力评价研究——以汉语言文学学科为例[J].中国图书馆学报, 2016(1): 96-108.
[13] D Torressalinas，A Cabezasclavijo，E Jimenezcontreras.Altmetrics: New Indicators for Scientific Communication in Web 2.0[J]. Comunicar, 2013, 21(41): 53-60.
[14] L Bornmann. Alternative metrics in scientometrics:a meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics[J].Scientometrics, 2015, 103(3): 1123-1144.
[15] ESI数据库 [EB/OL]. [2016-03-10]. http://esi.incites.thomsonreuters.com/.
[16] 王睿, 胡文静, 郭玮. 常用Altmetrics工具比较[J].现代图书情报技术, 2014(12): 18-26.
[17] About Article Metrics in Scopus [EB/OL].[2016-03-10]. http://help.elsevier.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/9258/p/9524/.
[18] 腾冲, 汪同庆. SPSS统计分析[M]. 武汉: 武汉大学出版社, 2014.
[19] 李小胜, 陈珍珍. 如何正确应用SPSS软件做主成分分析[J]. 统计研究, 2010(8): 105-108.
[20] Bookmarklet for Researchers [EB/OL]. [2016-03-10]. https://www.altmetric.com/audience/researchers/.
[21] Katrin Weller. Social Media and Altmetrics: An Overview of Current Alternative Approaches to Measuring Scholarly Impact [M]. Springer, 2015:261-276.