图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 4-16.

• 特别策划 •    下一篇

“全民阅读立法的时代意义与图书馆使命”专家笔谈

徐雁,李东来,徐强,张岩,金可可   

  • 出版日期:2026-04-15 发布日期:2026-04-28
  • 作者简介:徐雁,李东来,徐强,张岩,金可可

Expert Forum on “The Epochal Significance of Nationwide Reading Legislation and the Mission of Libraries”

Xu Yan,  Li Donglai,  Xu Qiang,  Zhang Yan,  Jin Keke   

  • Online:2026-04-15 Published:2026-04-28
  • About author:Xu Yan,  Li Donglai,  Xu Qiang,  Zhang Yan,  Jin Keke

摘要: 《全民阅读促进条例》已于2026年2月1日正式施行,标志着全民阅读进入法治保障新时期。徐雁指出旧书业是文化传承与知识传播的重要载体。针对优良旧书货源短缺的困境,呼吁图书馆剔除馆藏过量复本、不同版本及零借阅图书,使其重新进入流通市场,实现资源优化配置,既支持旧书行业发展,又促进全民阅读,形成良性循环。李东来指出,图书馆应借此契机,担当全民阅读的“核心力量、主要阵地和重要组织者”。针对部分县区图书馆经费匮乏、基层阅读设施短缺等问题,呼吁图书馆应善用法治武器,主动承担民众阅读权利代言人角色,同时加强自身能力建设,推动全民阅读推广向基层延伸、向纵深发展,在法治进程中实现转型发展。徐强解读了《全民阅读促进条例》的核心要义,梳理其与《中华人民共和国公共文化服务保障法》《中华人民共和国公共图书馆法》的体系衔接,以上海实践为样本,分析公共图书馆在全民阅读促进中的法定定位与服务创新。虽然上海形成“中心馆引领、总分馆联动、基层服务点覆盖”的格局,但依然面临资源不均等挑战。未来需推进法治完善与实践深化,强化数字化转型与全生命周期服务。张岩指出,《全民阅读促进条例》与《中华人民共和国公共文化服务保障法》《中华人民共和国公共图书馆法》相比有显著差异和特色亮点。《全民阅读促进条例》通过建立刚性协同机制与问责条款,实现全民阅读治理从“软性倡导”向“硬性约束”质变,将显著增强图书馆阅读推广的“朋友圈”力量。金可可探讨了图书馆在全民阅读促进工作中的核心地位及地方立法路径。从空间载体、活动组织、阅读调查3方面论证图书馆的独特功能,相较于《中华人民共和国公共图书馆法》,《全民阅读促进条例》强化了公共图书馆在阅读指导、设施更新、安全保障等方面的义务,并对地方立法给出建议。

关键词: 《全民阅读促进条例》, 法治保障, 公共图书馆, 阅读推广, 旧书流通, 地方立法, 书香社会

Abstract: The Regulationon on Promoting Nationwide Reading officially came into effect on February 1,  2026,  marking a new era of legal protection for nationwide reading initiatives. Xu Yan points out that the secondhand book industry is an important carrier of cultural heritage and knowledge dissemination. In response to the shortage of quality secondhand book sources,  Xu calls on libraries to remove excessive duplicate copies,  different editions,  and books with zero circulation from their collections so that these books can re-enter the circulation market. This would optimize resource allocation,  support the development of the secondhand book industry,  and promote nationwide reading,  thereby forming a virtuous cycle. Li Donglai notes that libraries should seize this opportunity to assume the role of the “core force,  main platform,  and key organizer” of nationwide reading. Addressing issues such as insufficient funding in some county and district libraries and the lack of grassroots reading facilities,  Li calls on libraries to make effective use of legal frameworks,  actively act as advocates for citizens‘ reading rights,  and strengthen their own institutional capacity. This would help extend reading promotion to grassroots communities and deepen its impact,  enabling libraries to achieve transformative development within the process of rule-of-law advancement. Xu Qiang interprets the core principles of the Regulation on Promoting Nationwide Reading and outlines how they connect with the Public Cultural Service Guarantee Law of the People’s Republic of China and the Public Library Law of the People‘s Republic of China. Using Shanghai as a case study,  Xu analyzes the statutory positioning and service innovations of public libraries in promoting nationwide reading. Shanghai has developed a structure characterized by “a leading central library,  coordinated branch libraries,  and full coverage via grassroots service points”,  though challenges such as uneven resource distribution remain. Future efforts should focus on improving the legal framework and deepening practical implementation,  while strengthening digital transformation and full life-cycle services. Zhang Yan points out that,  compared with the Public Cultural Service Guarantee Law of the People's Republic of China and the Public Library Law of the People's Republic of China,  the Regulation on Promoting Nationwide Reading demonstrates significant differences and distinctive highlights. By establishing rigid coordination mechanisms and accountability clauses,  the regulation shift nationwide reading governance from “soft advocacy” to “hard constraints”, significantly strengthening the network and collaborative influence of libraries in reading promotion. Jin Keke explores the central role of libraries in promoting nationwide reading and possible pathways for local legislation. From three perspectives,  namely,  spatial infrastructure,  activity organization,  and reading surveys,  Jin demonstrates the unique functions of libraries. Compared with the  Public Library Law of the People's Republic of China,  the Regulation on Promoting Nationwide Reading further strengthens the responsibilities of public libraries in areas such as reading guidance,  facility upgrades,  and safety assurance,  while also offering recommendations for local legislative development.

Key words: Regulation on Promoting Nationwide Reading, , Rule of law protection, , Public libraries, , Reading promotion, , Secondhand book circulation, , Local legislation, , Reading-oriented society