标准文献CNMARC格式分类标引的再探讨

图书馆杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 65-68.

标准文献CNMARC格式分类标引的再探讨

汪海波，汤彩霞

出版日期:2026-02-15 发布日期:2026-02-27
作者简介:汪海波武汉大学图书馆，副研究馆员。研究方向：信息资源组织、智慧图书馆。作者贡献：论文的撰写与修改。E-mail： hbwang@lib.whu.edu.cn 湖北武汉430072
汤彩霞武汉大学图书馆，副研究馆员。研究方向：信息资源组织、智慧图书馆。作者贡献：论文的撰写与修改。湖北武汉430072

A Re-Examination of Classification Indexing of Standards Literature in the CNMARC Format

Wang Haibo, Tang Caixia

Online:2026-02-15 Published:2026-02-27
About author:Wang Haibo, Tang Caixia

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 国际标准分类号和中国标准分类号是目前标准文献的必备信息，也是标准文献检索的重要途径。对于这两个分类号，中国国家图书馆采取不予著录的方法，CALIS联合编目中心在300字段予以著录，也有学者建议两个分类号同时著录入686字段。根据CNMARC字段定义和编排原则，编目人员应对标准文献分别启用不同的分类法字段标引，国际标准分类号应著录于686字段，中国标准分类号应著录于696字段。

关键词: 标准文献, 国际标准分类法, 中国标准分类法, 686字段, 696字段

Abstract: The International Standard Classification Number and the Chinese Standard Classification Number are essential information for current standard literature and serve as important access points for retrieval. With regard to these two classification numbers, the National Library of China adopts a practice of not recording them, while the CALIS Joint Cataloging Center records in the 300 field. Some scholars have also suggested recording both numbers simultaneously in the 686 field. Based on the field definitions and arrangement principles of CNMARC, this paper argues that catalogers should apply different classification fields when indexing standards documents: the International Standard Classification Number uses the 686 field, while the Chinese Standard Classification Number uses the 696 field.

Key words: Standards literature, , International Standard Classification, Chinese Standard Classification, 686 field, 696 field

汪海波, 汤彩霞. 标准文献CNMARC格式分类标引的再探讨[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2026, 45(2): 65-68.

Wang Haibo, Tang Caixia. A Re-Examination of Classification Indexing of Standards Literature in the CNMARC Format[J]. Libraly Journal, 2026, 45(2): 65-68.