图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (406): 130-140.

• 文献考论 • 上一篇    

国家图书馆藏明钞本《说苑》版本价值新探

丁新宇(聊城大学文学院)   

  • 出版日期:2025-02-15 发布日期:2025-02-27
  • 作者简介:丁新宇 聊城大学文学院,讲师,博士。研究方向:历史文献学。E-mail:1462308891@qq.com 山东聊城252000

A New Study on the Value of the Ming Handwritten Edition of Shuo Yuan in the National Library Collection

Ding Xinyu (School of Literature, Liaocheng University)   

  • Online:2025-02-15 Published:2025-02-27
  • About author:Ding Xinyu (School of Literature, Liaocheng University)

摘要:

长期以来,学界大多误认为国家图书馆藏明钞本《说苑》就是《四部丛刊》据以印行的版本。由于《四部丛刊》本便于获得,学者便不再关注其底本,最终导致两个不同的版本被后人混为一谈。国图藏明钞本《说苑》,在字体、流传、内容、避讳、著录等方面都与《四部丛刊》本有所不同。特别是在避讳、内容等方面,明显表露出国图藏明钞本早于《四部丛刊》的底本,是一个内容更完整、讹误更少、源头更早的善本。此外,这一版本还能用来校正宋元刊本的文字,颇值得我们重视和利用。

Abstract:

For a long time, most scholars mistakenly believed that the Ming handwritten edition ShuoYuan , which is collected in National Library of China, is the edition on which the Si Bu Cong Kanwas printed. Due to the easy availability of the Si Bu Cong Kan Text, scholars no longer paid attention to where its text came from, resulting in two different editions being regarded as the same by latergenerations. Ming handwritten edition Shuo Yuan is different from the Si Bu Cong Kan Text in terms offont, circulation, content, taboo and description. It clearly shows that the Ming banknote edition ShuoYuan is earlier than the base edition of the Si Bu Cong Kan Text. It is also a better edition with more complete content, less error and earlier source, especially in terms of taboo and content. In addition, this version can also be used to revise the content of the Song Dynasty and Yuan Dynasty versions, which isvery worthy of our attention and use.