开放科学环境下注册式研究报告发展特点剖析

图书馆杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 29-38.

开放科学环境下注册式研究报告发展特点剖析

黄国彬郑霞刘源陈琛妍

出版日期:2021-09-15 发布日期:2021-09-27
作者简介:黄国彬北京师范大学政府管理学院，副教授，硕士研究生导师，博士。研究方向：信息法学、信息资源管理、信息分析等。作者贡献：论文的选题，论文的撰写、修改与指导。E-mail：huanggb@bnu.edu. cn 北京 100875 郑霞女，中国人民大学实验室管理与教学条件保障处，硕士研究生。研究方向：信息法学、信息资源管理。作者贡献：论文的资料收集、整理与分析，论文的撰写与投稿。北京 100875 刘源女，北京师范大学政府管理学院，硕士研究生。研究方向：信息资源管理。作者贡献：论文的资料收集、汇总。北京 100875 陈琛妍女，北京师范大学政府管理学院，本科生。作者贡献：论文的资料收集。北京 100875

An Analysis on the Development Characteristics#br# of Registered Reports in Open Science Environment#br#

Huang Guobin, Zheng Xia,#br# Liu Yuan, Chen Chenyan#br#

Online:2021-09-15 Published:2021-09-27
About author:Huang Guobin1, Zheng Xia2, Liu Yuan1, Chen Chenyan1 (1 School of Government, Beijing Normal University; 2 Office of Laboratory Management and Teaching Facilities Development, Renmin University of China)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 开放科学环境下催生的注册式研究报告已受到国内外学术界和出版界的广泛关注，揭示其发展现状可在一定程度上反映现阶段注册式研究报告的研究热点、变化规律和发展趋势。综合应用内容分析法和统计分析法，从发表时间分布、来源期刊分布、作者机构分布、被引频次分布、研究主题分布以及地区分布等6个维度全面梳理注册式研究报告的发展现状，总结提炼出注册式研究报告当前发展的基本特点。注册式研究报告的当前发展特点体现为：发表年份呈逐年增长趋势；来源期刊集中于少数几家；创作注册式研究报告的第一作者所在机构分布较为分散，高等院校在推动其发展中发挥着主要作用；注册式研究报告已形成一定的学术影响力；主要集中在医学和心理学等领域；发表注册式研究报告的地区主要来自发达国家。

Abstract: The Registered Reports in the open scientific environment has received extensive attention from worldwide academic and publishing industry. Revealing their publishing status and trends can reflect the research hotspots and changing path of the registered reports to some extent. Using comprehensive content and statistical analysis method, this paper analyzes the publishing characteristics and trends of the registered reports from six indicators: the distribution of published date/time, source journals, author and affiliation, citation frequency, research topics, and regions where authors are from. It then summarizes and extractes the basic characteristics of the registered reports. The current publishing characteristics and trends of the registered reports are as follows: the number of the published registered reports is increasing year by year; the source journals are concentrated in a few publishers; the institutions of the first authors of the registered reports are scattered in different areas; universities play a major role during its publishing and dissemination; the registered reports have formed a certain academic influence; they are mainly concentrated in the fields of medicine and psychology; and the regions where the registered reports are published are mainly developed countries.

黄国彬郑霞刘源陈琛妍. 开放科学环境下注册式研究报告发展特点剖析[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2021, 40(9): 29-38.

Huang Guobin, Zheng Xia, Liu Yuan, Chen Chenyan. An Analysis on the Development Characteristics#br# of Registered Reports in Open Science Environment#br#[J]. Libraly Journal, 2021, 40(9): 29-38.

参考文献

[ 1 ] 吴建中. 推进开放数据助力开放科学[J]. 图书
馆杂志, 2018, 37(2): 4-10.
[ 2 ] COS. Preregistration: A Plan, Not a Prison[EB/OL].
(2017-05-23). [2019-06-10] https://cos.io/blog/
preregistration-plan-not-prison/.
[ 3 ] Nosek B A, Ebersole C R, Dehaven A C, et al. The
Preregistration Revolution[J]. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 2018, 115(11): 2600-2606.
[ 4 ] Center for Open Science. Registered Reports[EB/
OL]. [2019-05-16]. http://cos.io/rr/.
[ 5 ] Mehlenbacher A R. Registered Reports: Genre
Evolution and the Research Article[J]. WrittenCommunication, 2019, 36(1): 38-67.
[ 6 ] Wiseman R, Watt C, Kornbrot D. Registered reports:
an early example and analysis[J/OL]. (2019-01-16).
[2019-10-31]. https://peerj.com/articles/6232.pdf.
[ 7 ] Sorokowski P, Groyecka A, Blaszczynski K, et
al. Registered Reports As a Method to Increase
Credibility of Science-Experimental Study Among
Psychological Students[J]. Journal of Education
Culture and Society, 2019, 10(2): 67-75.
[ 8 ] Grand J A, Rogelberg S G, Banks G C, et al. From
Outcome to Process Focus: Fostering a More Robust
Psychological Science Through Registered Reports
and Results-Blind Reviewing[J]. Perspectives on
Psychological Science, 2018, 13(4): 448-456.
[ 9 ] Washburn A N, Hanson B E, Motyl M, et al. Why
Do Some Psychology Researchers Resist Adopting
Proposed Reforms to Research Practices? A
Description of Researchers’ Rationales[J]. Advances
in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science,
2018, 1(2): 166-173.
[10] Center for Open Science. About COS[EB/OL].
[2019-04-22]. https://cos.io/.
[11] Elsevier. Spliting the review process into two stages
[EB/OL]. [2019-05-16]. https://www.elsevier.com/
editors-update/story/peer-review/spliting-thereview-
process-into-two-stages.
[12] Zotero[EB/OL]. [2019-06-19]. https://www.zotero.
org/.
[13] JMIR Publications. What is an International
Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)? [EB/OL].
[2019-10-31]. https://support.jmir.org/hc/en-us/
articles/360003797672.
[14] Hagger M S, Chatzisarantis N L D. A Multilab
Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion
Effect[J]. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
2016, 11(4): 546-573.
[15] Wagenmakers E J, Beek T, Dijkhoff L, et al.
Registered Replication Report: Strack, Martin, &
Stepper (1988)[J]. Perspectives on Psychological
Science, 2016, 11(6): 917-928.
[16] Cong L W, He Z. Blockchain Disruption and Smart
Contracts[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2019,
32(5): 1754-1797.
[17] Alogna V K, Attaya M K, Aucoin P, et al. Registered
Replication Report: Schooler and Engstler-
Schooler(1990)[J]. Perspectives on Psychological
Science, 2014, 9(5): 556-578.
[18] Foley S, Karlsen J R, Putni?? T J. Sex, Drugs and
Bitcoin: How Much Illegal Activity is Financed
Through Cryptocurrencies?[J]. The Review of
Financial Studies, 2019, 32(5): 1798-1853.
[19] Biais B, Bisiere C, Bouvard M, et al. The Blockchain
Folk Theorem[J]. The Review of Financial Studies,
2019, 32(5): 1662-1715.
[20] Johnson D J, Cheung F, Donnellan M B. Does
Cleanliness Influence Moral Judgments?[J]. Social
Psychology, 2014(45): 209-215.
[21] Bolier L, Haverman M, Kramer J, et al. An Internetbased
Intervention to Promote Mental Fitness For
Mildly Depressed Adults: Randomized Controlled
Trial[J]. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2013,
15(9): e200.
[22] Alkhaldi G, Hamilton F L, Lau R, et al. The
Effectiveness of Prompts to Promote Engagement with
Digital Interventions: A Systematic Review[J]. Journal
of medical Internet research, 2016, 18(1): e6.
[23] Bouwmeester S, Verkoeijen P P, Aczel B, et al.
Registered Replication Report: Rand, Greene, and
Nowak (2012)[J]. Perspectives on Psychological
Science, 2017, 12(3): 527-542.
[24] European Open Science Cloud[EB/OL]. [2019-06-
24]. https://www.eosc-portal.eu/about/eosc.
[25] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and
Medicine. Open Science by Design: Realizing a
Vision for 21st Century Research[R]. Washington,
DC: The National Academies Press. 2018.