卡利马科斯的穿越与图书馆学内涵的悬置：19-


	20世纪上半叶图书馆学内涵反思

doi:10.13663/j.cnki.lj.2020.12.001

图书馆杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 4-13.doi: 10.13663/j.cnki.lj.2020.12.001

• 理论探索 • 下一篇

卡利马科斯的穿越与图书馆学内涵的悬置：19- 20世纪上半叶图书馆学内涵反思

于良芝樊振佳

于良芝樊振佳（南开大学商学院信息资源管理系）

收稿日期:2020-12-12 修回日期:2020-12-29 出版日期:2020-12-30 发布日期:2020-12-30
通讯作者: 樊振佳，E-mail：fanzhenjia@nankai.edu.cn
作者简介:于良芝女，南开大学商学院信息资源管理系，教授，博士生导师。研究方向：图书馆学基础理论、信息社会问题、图书馆管理。作者贡献：论文思路与结构设计、撰写与修改。E-mail：lzhyu@nankai.edu. cn 天津 300071 ；樊振佳南开大学商学院信息资源管理系，副教授，硕士生导师。研究方向：信息社会问题、政府信息资源管理。作者贡献：参与论文思路讨论、撰写与修改。天津 300071

Callimachus’s Time Travel and Reflections on the Definitions of Library Science

Yu Liangzhi, Fan Zhenjia

Yu Liangzhi, Fan Zhenjia (Department of Information Resources Management, Business School, Nankai University)

Received:2020-12-12 Revised:2020-12-29 Online:2020-12-30 Published:2020-12-30
Contact: Fan Zhenjia，E-mail：fanzhenjia@nankai.edu.cn
About author:Yu Liangzhi Female, Department of Information Resource Management, School of Business, Nankai University, teacher Granted, doctoral supervisor. Research direction: basic theory of library science, letter Information on social issues, library management. Author's contribution: paper ideas and Structural design, writing and modification. E-mail: lzhyu@nankai.edu. cn Tianjin 300071 ; Fan Zhenjia, Associate Professor, Department of Information Resource Management, School of Business, Nankai University Master Instructor. Research direction: information society issues, government information resources Source management. Author's contribution: Participate in the discussion, writing and revision of the paper change. Tianjin 300071

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文旨在反思现有图书馆学的内涵，质疑我们对它的理所当然的持守。首先从“图书馆学萌芽于古代图书馆”的共识出发，以古代亚历山大图书馆为例，考察了亚历山大图书馆所孕育的学科萌芽，确认出三种不同的萌芽：问题萌芽（以如何保障文献查询和获取作为基本问题）、对象萌芽（以图书馆作为研究对象）和内容萌芽（以图书馆业务作为研究内容），指出它们预示了三种不同的学科内涵。本文接着考察了19世纪初至20世纪上半叶的图书馆学内涵及其与上述古代萌芽的关联，认为施莱廷格和杜威理解的图书馆学呼应亚历山大图书馆孕育的内容萌芽，芝加哥大学图书馆研究生院理解的图书馆学呼应亚历山大图书馆孕育的对象萌芽。最后，本文在悬置上述图书馆学内涵及其影响的前提下，直接将三种萌芽预示的学科内涵置于当代信息环境中比较其合理性，呼吁当代图书馆学据此重新阐释自身内涵。

关键词: 图书馆学 , 图书馆学萌芽 , 亚历山大图书馆

Abstract: This paper aims to reflect upon existing definitions of library science and our taken-for-granted attitudes towards it through a revisit to the embryonic stage of the discipline and a phenomenological reduction of existing definitions. It first examines the nascent disciplinary focus of the ancient Alexandria Library and identifies three different foci: on the way to ensure document search and access as the discipline’s fundamental issue, on the library itself as the discipline’s research object, and on the operation of the library as the discipline’s content. It then examines the definitions of library science as espoused by Schrettinger, Dewey and the Graduate Library School (GLS) at the University of Chicago and argues that Schrettinger’s definition aligns primarily with the focus on library’s operation as the discipline’s contents, while GLS’s with the focus on library as the discipline’s research object. Having bracketed these definitions in a phenomenological manner, this study concludes that library science needs to redirect itself to deal with information search and access as the discipline’s fundamental issue. Keywords Library science, The embryonic stage of library science,

于良芝樊振佳. 卡利马科斯的穿越与图书馆学内涵的悬置：19- 20世纪上半叶图书馆学内涵反思 [J]. 图书馆杂志, 2020, 39(12): 4-13.

Yu Liangzhi, Fan Zhenjia. Callimachus’s Time Travel and Reflections on the Definitions of Library Science[J]. Libraly Journal, 2020, 39(12): 4-13.

参考文献

[ 1 ] Cronin B. Shibboleth and substance in North American Library and Information Science education [J]. International Journal of Libraries and Information Studies, 1995, 45( 1): 45-63. [ 2 ] Cronin B. Cutting the gordian knot [J]. Information Processing ＆ Management, 1995, 31(6): 897-902. [ 3 ] Wiegand W A. Tunnel vision and blind spots: What the past tells us about the present: reflections on the twentieth-century history of American librarianship [J]. The Library Quarterly, 1999, 69 (1): 1-32. [ 4 ] 米歇尔·福柯. 知识考古学[M]. 谢强, 马月, 译. 北京: 三联书店, 2007. [ 5 ] J.丹纳赫, 等. 理解福柯[M]. 刘瑾, 译. 天津: 百花文艺出版社, 2002. [ 6 ] The Lost Treasure of the Alexandria Library [EB/ OL]. [2020-10-07]. https://www.dailymotion.com/ video/x7bpk1i. [ 7 ] Bagnall R S. Alexandria: Library of dreams[J]. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 2002, 146(4): 348-362. [ 8 ] Erskine A. Culture and power in Ptolemaic Egypt: The Museum and Library of Alexandria[J]. Greece & Rome , 1995, 42(1): 38-48. [ 9 ] Franz G. The ancient Library at Alexandria: Embracing the excellent, avoiding its fate[C]. Association of College & Research Libraries, 2011: 1-6. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org. acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/ national/2011/papers/ancient_library.pdf. [10] 王世伟. 埃及亚历山大图书馆概述[J]. 图书馆论坛, 2005(6): 291-294;21. [11] 吴雪梅, 朱和海. 亚历山大图书馆及其对后世文化的影响[J]. 阿拉伯世界研究, 2019(5): 68-73. [12] Witty F J. The Pínakes of Callimachus[J]. Library Quarterly, 1958, 28(2): 132-136. [13] Garrett J. Redefining order in the German Library, 1775-1825[J]. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 1999, 33 (1): 103-123. [14] Dummer E H. Johann Christoph Von Aretin: A reevaluation[J]. Library Quarterly, 1946, 16 (2): 108-121. [15] Buckland M K. From Bibliography to Documentography[C]. Proceedings from the Document Academy, 2018, 5(2): Article 2. [16] Grasberger F. On the psychology of librarianship[J]. Library Quarterly, 1954, 24(1): 35-46. [17] Rockwood R H. Melvil Dewey and Librarianship[J]. Journal of Library History, 1968, 3(4): 329-341. [18] Williamson C C. Training for Library Service: A Report Prepared for the Carnegie Corporation of New York[M]. Boston: The Merrymount Press, 1923. [19] Williamson C C. The place of research in library service[J]. Library Quarterly, 1931, 1(1): 1-17. [20] Richardson J V. The Spirit of Inquiry in Library Science: The Graduate Library School at Chicago, 1921-1951 [D]. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, 1978. [21] Meyer H H B. Librianship: A definition[J]. Library Journal, 1925, 50: 177. [22] Bay J C. The Science in the Training of the Librarian[M]. Holstebro, Denmark: N. P. Thomsen, 1928: 7-8. [23] Waples D. The Graduate School of Chicago[J]. Library Quarterly, 1931, 1(1): 26. [24] Butler P. An Introduction to Library Science[

卡利马科斯的穿越与图书馆学内涵的悬置：19- 20世纪上半叶图书馆学内涵反思

Callimachus’s Time Travel and Reflections on the Definitions of Library Science

PDF(CN)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价