基于元分析的云计算用户采纳行为影响因素研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 众多学者都对云计算用户采纳行为的影响因素进行了分析，但不同的个体研究得出的研究结论在程度和方向上存在明显的差异。鉴于此，本研究采用文献定量分析的元分析方法对国内外20篇相关实证研究文献共8 508个独立样本进行综合分析。结果表明，云计算用户采纳行为的影响因素主要有感知有用性、感知易用性、感知风险、信任、个人创新、社会影响和云计算自身特性，其中感知有用性在所有因素中对采纳行为的影响强度最大，而感知风险则对云计算用户采纳行为具有显著的阻碍作用，同时本文对影响采纳行为的各个因素及其之间的相互关系进行了相关分析。通过元分析得出了对云计算用户采纳行为影响因素的一般性结论，为日后的进一步研究提供了实践基础，并为个人、企业、政府等机构的云计算采纳给予了一定的启示。

关键词: 元分析, ? 云计算?, 采纳行为

Abstract: Many scholars have analyzed the factors affecting adoption behavior of cloud computing, but there are obvious differences in the degree and direction of the research conclusions. Therefore, this study adopts meta analysis to analyze 8 508 samples in the 20 independent empirical studies. The results show that factors affecting of cloud computing adoption behavior are perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived risk, trust, personal creativity, social influence and cloud computing’s characteristics. Among all these factors, the perceived usefulness has the strongest impact on adoption behavior, whereas known risk a significant negative effect on the behavior. The study also analyzes the correlation of various factors, and by way of meta-analysis, draws a general conclusions applicable to cloud computing adoption, providing a practical basis for the further research in the future, and inspirations for individuals, businesses, governments and other institutions of cloud computing adoption.

Key words: Meta-analysis, Cloud computing, Adoption behavior

陈鹤阳. 基于元分析的云计算用户采纳行为影响因素研究[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2018, 37(4): 86-94.

Chen Heyang. Factors Affecting Adoption of Cloud Computing: A Meta Analysis[J]. Libraly Journal, 2018, 37(4): 86-94.

参考文献

[1] Wangli zhe, Tao Jie, KUNZEM. Scientific cloudcomputing: early definition and experience[C]//Procof the 10th IEEE International Conference onHigh Performance Computing and Communications,2008: 825-830.
[2] Park E, Kim K J. An integrated adoption modelof mobile cloud services: exploration of keydeterminants and extension of technology acceptancemodel[J]. Telematics and Informatics, 2014, 31(3):376-385.
[3] Wu W W. Developing an explorative model for SaaSadoption[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011,38(12): 15057-15064.
[4] Seo K. An explorative model for B2B cloud serviceadoption in Korea: focusing on IaaS adoption[J].International Journal of Smart Home, 2013, 7(5):155-164.
[5] Oliveira T, Thomas M, Espadanal M. Assessingthe determinants of cloud computing adoption:ananalysis of the manufacturing and services sectors[J].Information & Management, 2014, 51(5): 497-510.
[6] Nkhoma M Z, Dang D P T, De S A, et al.Contributing factors of cloud computing adoption:a technology-organization-environment frameworkapproach[C]//Proceedings of the EuropeanConference on Information Management, 2013: 180-188.
[7] Low C, Chen Y, Wu M. Understanding thedeterminants of cloud computing adoption[J].Industrial management & data systems, 2011,111(7): 1006-1023.
[8] R Agarwal, J Prasad. A conceptual and operationaldefinition of personal innovativeness in the domainof information technology[J]. Information SystemRes, 1998(9): 204-215.
[9] E M Rogers.Diffusion of Innovations[M]. New York:The Free Press 5th, 2003: 48.
[10] F D Davis. Perceived usefulness, perceivedease of use, and user acceptance of informationtechnology[J]. Management Information SystemQuarterly, 1989(13): 319-340.
[11] Opitz N, Langkau T F, Schmidt N H, et al. Technologyacceptance of cloud computing: empirical evidencefrom German IT departments [C]//System Science(HICSS), 45th Hawaii International Conference.IEEE, 2012:1593-1602.
[12] Tjikongo R, Uys W. The viability of cloud computingadoption in SMME’s in Namibia[C]//IST-AfricaConference and Exhibition (IST-Africa), IEEE,2013:1-11.
[13] Giffin K. The contribution of studies of sourcecredibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in thecommunication process[J]. Psychological Bulletin,1967, 68(2): 104-120.
[14] Opala O J, Rahman S M. An exploratory analysisof the influence of information security on theadoption of cloud computing[C]//System of SystemsEngineering (SoSE), 2013 8th InternationalConference. IEEE, 2013:165-170.
[15] Doney P M, Cannon J P. An examination of thenature of trust in buyer-seller relationships[J].Journal of Marketing, 1997, 61(2): 35-51.
[16] Heart T. Who is Out There?Exploring the effectsof trust and perceived risk on SaaS adoptionintentions[J]. Data Base For Advances in InformationSystems, 2010, 41(3): 49-68.
[17] J Lu, J E Yao, C S Yu. Personal innovativeness,social influences and adoption of wireless Internetservices via mobile technology[J]. StrategyInformation System, 2005(14): 245-268.
[18] M Y Yi, J D Jackson, J S Park, et al. Understandinginformation technology acceptance by individualprofessionals: toward an integrative view[J].Information Management, 2006(43): 350-353.
[19] Behrend T S, Wiebe E N, London J E, et al. Cloudcomputing adoption and usage in communitycolleges[J]. Behaviour & Information Technology,2011, 30(2): 231-240.
[20] D H McKnight, V Choudhury, C Kacmar. Developingand validating trust measures for e-commerce:anintegrative typology[J]. Information System Res,2002(13): 334-359.
[21] Shin D H. User centric cloud service model in publicsectors: policy implications of cloud services[J].Government Information Quarterly, 2013, 30(2):194-203.
[22] Shin J, Jo M, Lee J, et al. Strategic management ofcloud computing services: focusing on consumeradoption behavior[J]. IEEE Transactions onEngineering Management, 2014, 61(3): 419-427.
[23] Du J, Lu J, Wu D, et al. User acceptance of softwareas a service:evidence from customers of China’sleading e-commerce company, Alibaba[J]. Journal ofSystems and Software, 2013, 86(8): 2034-2044.
[24] Glass G. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis ofresearch[J]. Educational Researcher, 1976, 5(10):3-8.
[25] Dan Jackson, Richard Riley, Ian R White.Multivariate meta-analysis: Potential and promise[J].Statistics in Medicine,2011(30): 2481-2498.
[26] 张天嵩, 钟文昭, 张素, 等. Stata在Meta分析时异质性评价中的应用[J]. 循环医学, 2008, 8(4): 231-234.
[27] 魏江, 赵立龙, 冯军政. 管理学领域中元分析研究现状评述及实施过程[J]. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2012, 42(5): 144-157.
[28] Higgins J P T, Green S. Cochrane Collaboration:Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews ofInterventions[M]. Chichester, England. Hoboken, NJ:Wiley-Blackwell, 2008: 12-13.