图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 115-118.

• 文献考论 • 上一篇    下一篇

荀勖《中经新簿》辩

刘芷新   

  • 出版日期:2018-11-15 发布日期:2018-11-23
  • 作者简介:刘芷新 湖南医药学院采编部工作,馆员。研究 方向:中国古代藏书史和目录学研究。E-mail: 1943586380@qq.com 湖南怀化 418000

The Debate about Xunxu’s Zhongjing Xinbu

Liu Zhixin   

  • Online:2018-11-15 Published:2018-11-23
  • Supported by:

     

摘要: 《中经新簿》之所以将图书分类法由《七略》的六分法变为四分法,主要是由于它是由典守者编制的典藏目录。《中经新簿》的四部不是分类,而是书库的编号,它实际分为14类。通过将《中经新簿》与其他书籍的比较以及历史背景的分析,我们发现,《中经新簿》绝非仅仅抄录书名和篇名,很有可能抄录了书中的精要之言,编成了一部兼具类书性质的目录。

关键词:  , 中经新簿,  典藏目录 , 四部分类法,  叙录 , 类书

Abstract: Zhongjing Xinbu changed its book classification from the six division method of Qilüe into four division method for it’s a preservation catalog compiled by librarians. Zhongjing Xinbu’s four divisions aren’t used as a classification but number of stacks,it was actually divided into fourteen categories. Through comparing Zhongjing Xinbu with other books and Historical background analysis,we found that Zhongjing Xinbu was definitely not a simple transcript of titles of books and volumes,its author was very likely to have transcribed essentials from books it included and compiled a catalog that has character of cyclopedia.

Key words:  , Zhongjing Xinbu, Preservation catalog, Four division classification, Descriptive catalogue, Cyclopedia