图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 107-112.

• 文献考论 • 上一篇    下一篇

《许森〈尔雅郑玄注稽存〉述评》商榷

胡 涛   

  1. 胡 涛 湖北大学文学院,博士,讲师。研究方向:文献整理与文化研究。E-mail:383997089@qq.com 湖北武汉 430062
  • 出版日期:2017-08-15 发布日期:2017-11-13

Discussion on Review of Erya Zheng Xuan Zhu Jicun By Xu Sen

Hu Tao   

  • Online:2017-08-15 Published:2017-11-13

摘要:

《图书馆杂志》所刊彭喜双的《许森〈尔雅郑玄注稽存〉述评——兼〈尔雅诂林叙录·郑玄‘尔雅注’(许森辑本)提要辨析》一文中存在诸多值得商榷之处:许森所辑之条数不对;认为许森不区分“《尔雅》郑玄注”与“郑玄本《尔雅》”、多为整合、“袭用”、“分析毫无意义”的观点不正确;认为慧琳《音义》中的材料实无可据太过绝对,主观性太强;对《尔雅诂林叙录·提要》的批评失当,存在一定误 读。

关键词:

《许森〈尔雅郑玄注稽存〉述评》, 商榷, 辑佚, 《尔雅诂 林》

Abstract:

There are some doubtful points in Peng Xishuang’s paper Review of Erya Zheng Xuan Zhu Jicun By Xu Sen which published in the Library Journal: the calculation of the number of Xu Sen’book was wrong; it was wrong to say that Xu Sen confused Zheng Xuan Ben Erya with Zheng Xuan Zhu Erya, Xu
Sen’s book was plagiarism and Xu’s analysis is meaningless. It was too subjectivity to affirm the material in Huilin Yinyi is not credible. The criticism of Erya Gulin Xulu was misconduct and misreading.

Key words:

Review of Erya Zheng Xuan Zhu Jicun By Xu Sen, Discussion, Compilation, Erya Gulin