图书馆杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 108-114.
• 文献考论 • 上一篇 下一篇
姚文昌
出版日期:
发布日期:
Yao Wenchang
Online:
Published:
摘要:
《语石》是清末著名学者叶昌炽在石刻学方面的代表性著作。该书自宣统元年刊刻以来,受到学界的广泛重视。后来各种印本的《语石》陆续问世,这些书无一例外地自称所用的底本为宣统元年的原刻本。原刻本的唯一性成为一种共识。经笔者仔细核对发现,《语石》的原刻本实际存在两个不同的版本。这就引发了我们对后来各种印本予以考辨区分的任务。本文即为解决这些问题而作。
关键词: 《语石》, &emsp, 宣统元年 , 版本, &emsp, 对校, &emsp, 考辨
Abstract:
Notes on Stele Inscriptions is famous scholar Ye Chang-chi’s representative work of lithograph at the end of the Qing Dynasty. The book received widespread attention in academic circles since it published in 1909.Then more and more derivatives have come. All of these thought themselves according to the original version. It’s uniqueness seems to be a public consensus. Through careful comparison, the original version of Notes on Stele Inscriptions has two versions. It leads us to distinguish between the various copies of later to the task. This article is to solve these problems.
Key words: Notes on Stele Inscriptions, The first year of Xuantong, Versions, Comparison, Distinguish
姚文昌. 《语石》版本考辨[J]. 图书馆杂志, 2017, 36(10): 108-114.
Yao Wenchang. A Distinguishment on Versions of Notes on Stele Inscriptions[J]. Libraly Journal, 2017, 36(10): 108-114.
/ / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://www.libraryjournal.com.cn/CN/
https://www.libraryjournal.com.cn/CN/Y2017/V36/I10/108
[1] 吴琦幸. 论《语石》在石刻研究中的意义[J]. 社会科学战线, 1988(3): 325.[2] 叶昌炽. 语石[M]. 沈阳: 辽宁教育出版社, 1998.[3] 卢芳玉. 《语石》研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2005:49.[4] 黄会奇. 对《语石》等石刻学著作的研究[J]. 新世纪图书馆, 2011(4): 90-91.[5] 王立民. 叶昌炽研究述论[ J]. 社会科学战线,2011(7): 99.[6] 叶昌炽. 缘督庐日记[M]. 南京: 江苏古籍出版社,2002.[7] 孙肇净. 王懿荣后代在天津[J/OL]. 今晚报(副刊),2014-11-02.[8] 万启盈. 中国近代印刷工业史[M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2012: 810.[9] 郭立暄. 中国古籍原刻翻刻与初印后印研究[M].上海: 中西书局, 2015: 416.[10] 杜泽逊. 文献学概要(修订本)[M]. 北京: 中华书局,2008: 362.