图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2014, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 32-39.

• 理论探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

福柯与章学诚的知识分类思想考察

李超民   

  • 出版日期:2014-09-15 发布日期:2014-09-25
  • 作者简介:李超民 上海财经大学图书馆,副研究员,博士。E-mail: fcli@mail.shufe.edu.cn 上海 200433

An Inquiry into the Taxology and Episteme: Foucault vs. Zhang Xuecheng

Li Chaomin   

  • Online:2014-09-15 Published:2014-09-25

摘要: 通过考察福柯《万物的秩序》与章学诚《文史通义》文本,比较分析东西方两位思想家的知识分类思想;指出文艺复兴以来,西方自然史研究解决了观察万物从结构、特征到新知识型的秩序化、运用科学语言重新组织和标记等问题,推动了近代知识转型,开启了科学革命先河。章学诚“疏通知远”原则是古代知识分类组织的思想基础,他深化了四部分类法理论体系与实践,他的科学标记知识的思想也有一定价值。章学诚知识组织思想离古代知识转型可能只有一步之遥。

关键词: 自然史, 分类学, 知识型(认识型), 福柯, 章学诚

Abstract: This author compares the taxological ideas of Michel Foucault in the West and Zhang Xuecheng in the East, by studying individual texts of them, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences and Wenshi Tongyi (General Principle of Literature and History). is the author points out that the studies of Natural Histories after the Renaissance, by setting up structures, depicting characters of things and using scientific and semantic language, realized new episteme systemization and created new order for Natural History in the past time, thus introducing the so-called Scientific Revolution in the West. Zhang Xuecheng’s knowledge classification principle of “Taking classification of books as a right way of organizing documents” founded China’s knowledge organization thoughts in history, his improvement the “Four Part Classification of Chinese Historical Documents” theories and practice, and his promotion of scientific labeling all have made him a pioneer of Chinese modern librarian of taxology. He was probably only one step away from a new episteme.

Key words: Natural History, Taxology, Episteme (L’épistémè), Michel Foucault, Zhang Xuecheng