THEORETICAL DISCUSSION

Callimachus’s Time Travel and Reflections on the Definitions of Library Science

Expand
  • Yu Liangzhi, Fan Zhenjia  (Department of Information Resources Management, Business School, Nankai University)
Yu Liangzhi Female, Department of Information Resource Management, School of Business, Nankai University, teacher Granted, doctoral supervisor. Research direction: basic theory of library science, letter Information on social issues, library management. Author's contribution: paper ideas and Structural design, writing and modification. E-mail: lzhyu@nankai.edu. cn Tianjin 300071 ; Fan Zhenjia, Associate Professor, Department of Information Resource Management, School of Business, Nankai University Master Instructor. Research direction: information society issues, government information resources Source management. Author's contribution: Participate in the discussion, writing and revision of the paper change. Tianjin 300071

Received date: 2020-12-12

  Revised date: 2020-12-29

  Online published: 2020-12-30

Abstract

This paper aims to reflect upon existing definitions of library science and our taken-for-granted attitudes towards it through a revisit to the embryonic stage of the discipline and a phenomenological reduction of existing definitions. It first examines the nascent disciplinary focus of the ancient Alexandria Library and identifies three different foci: on the way to ensure document search and access as the discipline’s fundamental issue, on the library itself as the discipline’s research object, and on the operation of the library as the discipline’s content. It then examines the definitions of library science as espoused by Schrettinger, Dewey and the Graduate Library School (GLS) at the University of Chicago and argues that Schrettinger’s definition aligns primarily with the focus on library’s operation as the discipline’s contents, while GLS’s with the focus on library as the discipline’s research object. Having bracketed these definitions in a phenomenological manner, this study concludes that library science needs to redirect itself to deal with information search and access as the discipline’s fundamental issue. Keywords Library science, The embryonic stage of library science,

Cite this article

Yu Liangzhi, Fan Zhenjia . Callimachus’s Time Travel and Reflections on the Definitions of Library Science[J]. Libraly Journal, 2020 , 39(12) : 4 -13 . DOI: 10.13663/j.cnki.lj.2020.12.001

References

[ 1 ] Cronin B. Shibboleth and substance in North American Library and Information Science education [J]. International Journal of Libraries and Information Studies, 1995, 45( 1): 45-63. [ 2 ] Cronin B. Cutting the gordian knot [J]. Information Processing & Management, 1995, 31(6): 897-902. [ 3 ] Wiegand W A. Tunnel vision and blind spots: What the past tells us about the present: reflections on the twentieth-century history of American librarianship [J]. The Library Quarterly, 1999, 69 (1): 1-32. [ 4 ] 米歇尔·福柯. 知识考古学[M]. 谢强, 马月, 译. 北京: 三联书店, 2007. [ 5 ] J.丹纳赫, 等. 理解福柯[M]. 刘瑾, 译. 天津: 百花 文艺出版社, 2002. [ 6 ] The Lost Treasure of the Alexandria Library [EB/ OL]. [2020-10-07]. https://www.dailymotion.com/ video/x7bpk1i. [ 7 ] Bagnall R S. Alexandria: Library of dreams[J]. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 2002, 146(4): 348-362. [ 8 ] Erskine A. Culture and power in Ptolemaic Egypt: The Museum and Library of Alexandria[J]. Greece & Rome , 1995, 42(1): 38-48. [ 9 ] Franz G. The ancient Library at Alexandria: Embracing the excellent, avoiding its fate[C]. Association of College & Research Libraries, 2011: 1-6. http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org. acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/ national/2011/papers/ancient_library.pdf. [10] 王世伟. 埃及亚历山大图书馆概述[J]. 图书馆论 坛, 2005(6): 291-294;21. [11] 吴雪梅, 朱和海. 亚历山大图书馆及其对后世文 化的影响[J]. 阿拉伯世界研究, 2019(5): 68-73. [12] Witty F J. The Pínakes of Callimachus[J]. Library Quarterly, 1958, 28(2): 132-136. [13] Garrett J. Redefining order in the German Library, 1775-1825[J]. Eighteenth-Century Studies, 1999, 33 (1): 103-123. [14] Dummer E H. Johann Christoph Von Aretin: A reevaluation[J]. Library Quarterly, 1946, 16 (2): 108-121. [15] Buckland M K. From Bibliography to Documentography[C]. Proceedings from the Document Academy, 2018, 5(2): Article 2. [16] Grasberger F. On the psychology of librarianship[J]. Library Quarterly, 1954, 24(1): 35-46. [17] Rockwood R H. Melvil Dewey and Librarianship[J]. Journal of Library History, 1968, 3(4): 329-341. [18] Williamson C C. Training for Library Service: A Report Prepared for the Carnegie Corporation of New York[M]. Boston: The Merrymount Press, 1923. [19] Williamson C C. The place of research in library service[J]. Library Quarterly, 1931, 1(1): 1-17. [20] Richardson J V. The Spirit of Inquiry in Library Science: The Graduate Library School at Chicago, 1921-1951 [D]. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, 1978. [21] Meyer H H B. Librianship: A definition[J]. Library Journal, 1925, 50: 177. [22] Bay J C. The Science in the Training of the Librarian[M]. Holstebro, Denmark: N. P. Thomsen, 1928: 7-8. [23] Waples D. The Graduate School of Chicago[J]. Library Quarterly, 1931, 1(1): 26. [24] Butler P. An Introduction to Library Science[
Outlines

/