[1] Strader C R. Cataloging to support information literacy: the IFLA library reference models user tasks in the context of the framework for information literacy for higher education[J]. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 2021, 59(5):442476.
[2] Hodge G M. Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries: beyond traditional authority files[M]. Washington, D.C.: Digital Library Federation, 2000.
[3] Lewandowski D. Using search engine technology to improve library catalogs[M]//Advances in Librarianship. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2010, 32:3554.
[4] Mitchell E T. Metadata literacy: an analysis of metadata awareness in college students[D]. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2010.
[5] Yue M. A survey of large language model agents for question answering[EB/OL]. (20250324 ) [20251107]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.19213.
[6] Scarlatos A, Liu N, Lee J, et al. Training LLMbased tutors to improve student learning outcomes in dialogues[C]//Cristea A I, Walker E, Lu Y, et al. Artificial Intelligence in Education(AIED 2025). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 15877. Cham: Springer, 2025:251266.
[7] Wysocki O, Wysocka M, Carvalho D S, et al. An LLMbased knowledge synthesis and scientific reasoning framework for biomedical discovery[C]//Cao Y X, Feng Y, Xiong D Y, et al. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics(Volume 3: System Demonstrations). Bangkok, Thailand: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2024:355364.
[8] Hildreth C R. Extending the access and reference service capabilities of the online public access catalog[C]//Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing. Champaign, IL, USA: University of Illinois UrbanaChampaign School of Information Sciences, 1987.
[9] Information Communication Technology for Libraries. Library Automation: Online Public Access Catalogue(OPAC) [EB/OL]. [20250623]. https://ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in/lisp5/chapter/libraryautomationonlinepublicaccesscatalogueopac.
[10] Wells D. Online public access catalogues and library discovery systems[J]. ISKO Encyclopedia of Knowledge Organization, 2020, 48(6):457466.
[11] Ho B. The Integrated Library Systems APIs, an Opensource Web 2.0 Catalog, and University Computing Live Happily Ever After[J]. Code4Lib Journal, 2010(12):4165.
[12] Houser J. The vufind implementation at Villanova University[J]. Library Hi Tech, 2009, 27(1):93105.
[13] 韩志萍.新一代OPAC开源软件的兴起及未来发展[J].大学图书馆学报,2009,27(6):3945.
[14] Mi J, Weng C. Revitalizing the library OPAC: interface, searching, and display challenges[J]. Information Technology and Libraries, 2008, 27(1):522.
[15] 陈亚宁.链接资料公用目录的评估初探[J]. 图书咨询学刊,2021, 19(2):113143.
[16] Yang S Q, Dawson P H. Representation of local collections in webscale discovery toolsdo discovery tools promote local holdings?[C]//satellite meeting: reference and information services and information technology sections, world library and information congress(WLIC). Warsaw, Poland: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions(IFLA), 2017.
[17] Breeding M. Indexbased discovery services: current market positions andtrends[M]. Chicago, USA: ALA TechSource, 2018.
[18] Wells D. Library discovery systems and their users: a case study from Curtin University Library[J]. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 2016, 47(2):92105.
[19] Daniels J, Robinson L, Wishnetsky S. Results of webscale discovery: data, discussions, and decisions[J]. The Serials Librarian, 2013, 64(1/4):8187.
[20] Cox C,Tzoc E. ChatGPT: implications for academic libraries[J]. College & Research Libraries News, 2023, 84(3):99.
[21] Columbia University. Enhancing library search system with AI technology at Columbia University[EB/OL]. (20240524)[20251105]. https://etc.cuit.columbia.edu/news/AICoPlibraryaugmentdiscoverywithAI.
[22] Lappalainen Y, Narayanan N. Aisha: a custom AI library chatbot using the ChatGPT API[J]. Journal of Web Librarianship, 2023, 17(3):3758.
[23] Georgieva E, Georgiev T. How artificial intelligence can transform services in research libraries[C]//International Conference on Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025:703716.
[24] Huang L, Yu W, Ma W, et al. A survey on hallucination in large language models: principles, taxonomy, challenges, and open questions[J]. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2025, 43(2):155.
[25] Chow E H C,Kao T J, Li X. An experiment with the use of ChatGPT for LCSH subject assignment on electronic theses and dissertations[J]. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 2024, 62(5):574588.
[26] Cox A M. Developing a Library Strategic Response to Artificial Intelligence[EB/OL]. (20231120 )[20251107]. https://www.ifla.org/g/ai/developingalibrarystrategicresponsetoartificialintelligence/.
[27] Mo F, Meng C,Aliannejadi M, et al. Conversational search: From fundamentals to frontiers in the LLM era[C]//International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(SIGIR 2025), Tutorial Track. New York: ACM, 2025:40944097.
[28] Dai S, Wang W, Pang L, et al. Nextsearch: rebuilding user feedback ecosystem for generative AI search[C]//International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(SIGIR 2025), Perspective Paper. New York: ACM, 2025:39223931.
[29] Yim K S. The taskoriented queries benchmark(ToQB) [EB/OL].(20240605) [20251107]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.02943.
[30] Xu Z,Cruz M J, Guevara M, et al. Retrievalaugmented generation with knowledge graphs for customer service question answering[C]//Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2024:29052909.
[31] Brown T, Mann B, Ryder N, et al.Language models are fewshot learners[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020, 33:18771901.
[32] Lewis P, Perez E,Piktus A, et al. Retrievalaugmented generation for knowledgeintensive NLP tasks[J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2020, 33:94599474.
[33] Strand K. Amplifying access to knowledge: evolving our publications catalog using generative artificial intelligence[EB/OL]. (20240816)[20250623]. https://blogs.iadb.org/conocimientoabierto/en/amplifyingaccesstoknowledgeevolvingourpubli
cationscatalogusinggenerativeartificialintelligence/.
[34] Li X, Jin J, Zhou Y, et al. From matching to generation: a survey on generative information retrieval[J]. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2025, 43(3):162.
[35] Mukhopadhyay P. Designing conversational search for libraries: retrieval augmented generation through open source large language models[J]. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 2025, 45(2):109115.
[36] Bevara R V K, Lund B D, Mannuru N R, et al. Prospects of retrieval augmented generation(RAG) for academic library search and retrieval[J]. Information Technology and Libraries, 2025, 44(2):115.
[37] Penha G, Vardasbi A, Palumbo E, et al. Bridging search and recommendation in generative retrieval: does one task help the other?[C]//Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 2024:340349.
[38] 郭利敏,付雅明,刘悦如.大语言模型驱动的图书馆书目检索系统研究——以“巴金主题文献展”策展任务为例[J].数字图书馆论坛,2025, 21(7):1319.
[39] Kasprzik A. Automating subject indexing at ZBW: Making research results stick in practice[J]. LIBER Quarterly: the Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries, 2023, 33(1):117.
[40] 郭利敏,付雅明.融合ReAct模式的图书馆大语言模型知识服务系统构建[J].图书馆论坛,2024, 44(6):6170.
[41] 郭利敏,付雅明,刘悦如.检索增强思维在图书馆知识挖掘服务中的应用研究[J].图书情报工作,2025, 69(21):108119.
|