图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 103-109.

• 文献考论 • 上一篇    下一篇

《明儒学案》勘误二十三则

赵文会   

  • 出版日期:2015-06-15 发布日期:2015-06-25
  • 作者简介:赵文会 福建师范大学社会历史学院, 博士研究生。研究方向:历史文献学。E-mail:zhe n _cheng002@163.com. 福建福州 350007

Twenty Three Corrigenda of“Ming Ru Xue An”

Zhao Wenhui   

  • Online:2015-06-15 Published:2015-06-25

摘要:

《明儒学案》各版本的内容有一些错误,如音近而误、形近而误、倒文、异文。各种致误原因有交叉,又有重复叠加,且同一版本系统流传下来的错误具有延续性。学案体史书的“选录性”决定了案主原著和选录者均可致误,但更多的是古籍在不断的传抄转刻过程中出现的错误,其具体致误的时间节点已很难确定。本文在对校各版本内容的基础上充分查找案主原著,并结合涉及《诗经》、《尚书》、《周易》、《史记》的内容进行他校。通过对内容的勘误,在一定程度上反映出了各版本的优劣。

关键词: 明儒学案, 黄宗羲, 勘误, 版本, 文献统计与分析

Abstract:

There are some errors of “Ming Ru Xue An” in its different editions, such as close sound lead to wrong, close shape lead to wrong, upside down lead to wrong and different word lead to wrong. These situation often cross each other and superposition. The mistake of same edition system has continuity. The “excerpt” of Xue an case history decide that original and selector could be mistake, but the more errors takes on constantly engraving and the accurate time node hardly to know. This paper use three methods correct errors, the first is compare with different editions; the second is check on original; the third is check on the Book of Songs, Book of History, the Book of Changes, the Historical Records. These corrections show the good and bad of various editions.

Key words: Ming Ru Xue An, Huang Zongxi, Corrigendum, Edition, Document statistics and analysis