图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (409): 136-144.

• 文献考论 • 上一篇    下一篇

国家图书馆藏明活字本《墨子》考论

沈凯文(扬州大学文学院)   

  • 出版日期:2025-05-15 发布日期:2025-05-28
  • 作者简介:沈凯文 扬州大学文学院,中国古典文献学专业博士研究生。研究方向:文献学、墨学。E-mail:931008235@qq.com 江苏扬州 225002

Research on the Ming Movable Version of Mozi Collected in the National Library of China

Shen Kaiwen (College of Liberal Arts, Yangzhou University)   

  • Online:2025-05-15 Published:2025-05-28
  • About author:Shen Kaiwen (College of Liberal Arts, Yangzhou University)

摘要:

补充以往关于明活字本《墨子》校行者陆稳的简单介绍,重新建构一个相比过去黄丕烈、海源阁、潘承厚这一脉络更为完善的递藏过程。详考道藏本与明活字本《墨子》异同,证实后者出于前者,而非黄丕烈、叶德辉、吴毓江等人判定的内府本、唐尧臣刻本或宋代遗本。明活字本《墨子》与唐尧臣刻本之关系,实为一源二流。除彰明较著的文物价值之外,明活字本《墨子》亦具有一定的校勘价值。同时,陆稳试行《墨子》,以致唐尧臣新刊、江藩重刻,推动了《墨子》的传播与阅读。此外,陆稳《新刊〈墨子〉叙》一文,对于墨学研究具有一定启示意义。

Abstract:

This paper supplements the previous brief introduction of Lu Wen, who is the publisherof the Ming movable version of Mozi, and reconstructs a more complete process of the collection thanthe past vein of Huang Pilie, Haiyuan Pavilion and Pan Chenghou. Examining in detail the similaritiesand differences between the Daozang version and the Ming movable version of Mozi, confirms that thelatter is derived from the former, rather than the Neifu version, the Tang Yaochen version or the Songversion determined by Huang Pilie, Ye Dehui, Wu Yujiang and others. The relationship between the Mingmovable version of Mozi and the Tang Yaochen version is actually one source generates two streams.In addition to the obvious heritage value, the Ming movable version of Mozi also has certain collationvalue. At the same time, Lu Wen tried out Mozi, so that Tang Yaochen’s new publication and Jiang Fan’sreprinting promoted the spread and reading of Mozi. In addition, Narrative of New Publication of Mozi byLu Wen has certain enlightenment significance for the study of Mohism.