图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (404): 124-130.

• 文献考论 • 上一篇    

国家图书馆藏《回回药方》残卷文献考述

张若诗1 王 锦2 王兴伊1 (1 上海中医药大学科技人文研究院 2 中国人民解放军陆军第958医院)
  

  • 出版日期:2024-12-15 发布日期:2024-12-30
  • 作者简介:张若诗 上海中医药大学科技人文研究院,博士研究生。研究方向:中医医史文献、中外传统医学交流互鉴。作者贡献:论文撰写与修改定稿。E-mail:waru¬oshi@163.com 上海 201203 王 锦 中国人民解放军陆军第958 医院,副主任医师。研究方向:中医与民族医学临床文献研究。作者贡献:资料搜集。 重庆 400020 王兴伊 上海中医药大学科技人文研究院,教授,博士研究生导师。研究方向:医古文、中医医史文献、出土医学文献教学与研究。作者贡献:论文选题、论文框架优化、审定。 上海 201203

A Textual Study of Huihui Yaofang Collected in the National Library of China

Zhang Ruoshi1, Wang Jin2, Wang Xingyi1 (1 Institute of Science, Technology and Humanities,#br# Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine; 2 No. 958 Hospital of PLA)#br#   

  • Online:2024-12-15 Published:2024-12-30
  • About author:Zhang Ruoshi1, Wang Jin2, Wang Xingyi1 (1 Institute of Science, Technology and Humanities, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine; 2 No. 958 Hospital of PLA)

摘要:

中国国家图书馆珍藏《回回药方》四卷抄本是中国与阿拉伯、波斯医药文化交流硕果仅存的珍贵典籍,也是“一带一路”多元医药文化交流的重要见证。其版本与编写体例未引起学界足够重视,当前研究多遵循宋岘先生观点“皆仿宋赵佶《圣济总录》之格式”。现考证《回回药方》与《圣济总录》原版(元代大德刻本)体例并不一致,而与《普济方》原版(明代抄本)在编纂体例、门类划分上高度相似。因《普济方》成书于明代初年,作为古代珍贵典籍的《回回药方》当仿照《普济方》体例而成书,因此其成书应在明初洪武永乐之后,而非学界普遍认同的元明之际。

关键词: 《回回药方》 《普济方》 版本 体例

Abstract:

The 4-volume codex of Huihui Yaofang in the collection of the National Library of China is the only surviving precious book that records the medical and cultural exchanges between China and Arabia and Persia, it is also important evidence of the cultural exchanges of diversified medicines along the “Belt and Road”. However, its edition and compilation style has not attracted enough attention in the academic community. Current studies mostly accept Mr. Song Xian’s point of view, namely “it is an imitation of the format of Shengji Zonglu”. It is found that Huihui Yaofang is not consistent with the original version of Shengji Zonglu (carved by Dade in the Yuan Dynasty) concerning the compilation style, but highly similar to the original version of Pujifang (copy of the Ming Dynasty) in terms of the style of the compilation, the division of the categories and the layout. Pujifang was completed in the early years of the Ming Dynasty. Huihui Yaofang is likely to be modeled on the Pujifang’s compilation style, so its publication date should be in the beginning of the Ming Dynasty, after the Hongwu-Yongle period, instead of the generally accepted late Yuan and early Ming.

Key words: Huihui Yaofang, Pujifang, Edition, Compilation style