图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (9): 21-30.

• 理论探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

21 世纪以来国内学位论文引文分析研究现状分析与展望

卢文辉 叶继元(南京大学信息管理学院)   

  • 出版日期:2021-09-15 发布日期:2022-09-22
  • 作者简介:卢文辉 南京大学信息管理学院,博士研究生。研 究方向:信息资源建设、学术评价。作者贡献:提 供研究框架、文献调研与分析、论文撰写与修改。 E-mail:923944919@qq.com 江苏南京 210023 叶继元 南京大学信息管理学院,教授,博士研究生 导师。研究方向:学术规范与学术评价、信息资源建 设等。作者贡献:方法及思路指导、提供文稿修改建 议。 江苏南京 210023

Research on Dissertations’ Citations in China Since the 21st Century and Its Future

Lu Wenhui, Ye Jiyuan (School of Information Management, Nanjing University)   

  • Online:2021-09-15 Published:2022-09-22
  • About author:Lu Wenhui, Ye Jiyuan (School of Information Management, Nanjing University)

摘要: 加强学位论文引文分析研究,对提高学位论文质量、完善新时代文献信息资源保障体系具有重要意义。为了解国内学位论文引文分析研究动态,促进学位论文引文分析研究的发展,从研究方法与工具、研究指标、研究主题3 个角度对21 世纪以来国内学位论文引文分析研究进行了系统梳理。研究发现,当前国内研究主要采用定量分析法,研究工具使用普遍较少,多数研究使用引文形式特征指标。有关研究对文献信息资源建设与用户需求分析、学位论文写作、学术规范研究等主题较为重视,对学位论文质量评价、引文数据收集与分析工具等主题关注不够。建议应重视并综合应用多种研究方法与工具,深化引文内容与效用特征研究,完善引文与论文质量评价研究。

Abstract: quality of dissertations and the supporting system of literature information resource in the new era. To understand the progress of dissertation citation analysis in China and to promote its development, this study systematically analyzed the dissertation citation analysis in China since the 21st century from three perspectives: methods and tools, indicators, and topics. It found that a lot of research had adopted the quantitative analysis methods, not many had used research tools, and that most had adopted the citation form feature index. Relevant research paid more attention to topics such as the analysis on the literature information resource development and users’ needs, the writing of dissertations and academic norms. Insufficient attention was paid to themes such as the quality evaluation of dissertations and the tool to collect and analyse the citations. This study suggested that we should emphasize and integrate multiple research methods and tools, deepen the research on citation content and utility characteristics, and improve the research on relationship between citations and the quality evaluation of dissertations