图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 101-106.

• 全民阅读推广学坛 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于大学生通识素养的模块化推荐书目构建研究

徐晓艳1 袁曦临1,2 潘海燕1 王骏1 (1 东南大学图书馆 2 东南大学经济管理学院)    

  • 出版日期:2022-07-15 发布日期:2022-07-19
  • 作者简介:徐晓艳  女,东南大学图书馆,助理馆员。研究方向:阅读研究、学习支持服务研究。作者贡献:论文撰写与 修 改。E-mail:xuxiaoyan@seu.edu.cn 江 苏 南 京211189 袁曦临  女,东南大学图书馆、东南大学经济管理学院,研究馆员,硕士研究生导师。研究方向:阅读研究、信息素养研究、学术资源评价。作者贡献:提出研究思路、修改意见及定稿。 江苏南京 210096 潘海燕  女,东南大学图书馆,助理馆员。研究方向:阅读研究、学科服务研究。作者贡献:书目搜集与评价。江苏南京 211189 王骏  东南大学图书馆,馆员。研究方向:阅读研究。作者贡献:通识教育模块调研、提出修改意见。江苏南京 211189

Research on the Construction of Modular Recommended Bibliography Based on the General Literacy of College Students

Xu Xiaoyan1 , Yuan Xilin1,2 , Pan Haiyan1 , Wang Jun1 (1 Southeast University Library; 2 School of Economics & Management, Southeast University)    

  • Online:2022-07-15 Published:2022-07-19
  • About author:Xu Xiaoyan1, Yuan Xilin1,2, Pan Haiyan1, Wang Jun1 (1 Southeast University Library; 2 School of Economics & Management, Southeast University)

摘要: 为实现图书馆深度嵌入大学本科通识教育,引导大学生阅读通识类图书以提升其综合素 养,探索以推荐书目的形式为高校图书馆的阅读育人服务提供新的思路和有益借鉴。首先调研分析 国内外高校通识教育模块,并结合大学生核心素养框架和东南大学人才培养理念,形成推荐书目 6 个模块。然后通过综合评价法遴选“东南荐读”推荐书目,展示基于通识教育素养的模块化推荐书 目的评价和选择过程。最后从书目推广、应用范围和借阅情况方面总结评价推荐书目的实践效果。

Abstract: To integrate library into the undergraduate general education of universities, and guide students to build up comprehensive quality by reading books of general education, book recommendation service is explored to provide a new and viable way for university libraries to educate students via reading. Six modules regarding recommended bibliography are developed through investigating the general education module in universities and colleges by means of case analysis. It considers the framework of core qualities of college students and the philosophy of talent training of Southeast University. Recommended bibliography of Southeast University is produced by the comprehensive evaluation method. The evaluation and selection process of the modular recommended bibliography based on the general literacy is demonstrated. Finally, the practical results of book recommendation service are evaluated with respect to bibliography promotion, application scope and borrowing situation.