图书馆杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 128-135.
• 文献考论 • 上一篇 下一篇
朱 岩(扬州大学文学院)
出版日期:
发布日期:
作者简介:
Zhu Yan (College of Literature, Yangzhou University)
Online:
Published:
About author:
摘要: 现存韩国奎章阁的朝鲜王朝《书》学文献《书义》抄本,其本旨虽然是为了应对朝鲜科 举中的“经义”考试,但具有独特的学术价值:第一,体现出朝鲜《尚书》学的“性理化”特征; 第二,较全面地展示出朝鲜王朝的政治伦理;第三,丰富与拓展了《书集传》的义理阐发。《书 义》的作者题为朝鲜大儒丁若镛,但学界一般认为并非如此。根据《书义》一书的性质以及丁若 镛本人的治《书》经历分析,目前学界判断《书义》是伪作的理据存在若干问题,《书义》的作者 应该是与丁若镛一样曾经在成均馆读书以备“大科”考试的生员。
关键词: 丁若镛 《书义》 伪作
Abstract: The manuscript of Shu Yi, the literature of Shu in Li dynasty of Korea, is now preserved in Korean Kyujanggak. Although it aimed originally at preparing for exams of Confucian classics commentaries in imperial civil examinations, it still presents a distinctive academic significance. First, it shows the rationalization in Korean researches on Shang Shu. Second, it demonstrates comprehensively the political ethics of Korean dynasty. Third, it enriches and enhances the commentaries of Shu Ji Zhuan. Besides, the author of Shu Yi is inscribed as Ding Ruoyong. However, the academia generally takes it as a pseudograph. According to the analysis of the nature of Shu Yi and Ding Ruoyong’s experience in studying Shu, there are some problems in the academic circles’justification for judging Shu Yi as a fake. The author of Shu Yi should be some student who studied at Sungkyunkwan for the great exams, just like Ding Ruoyong.
Key words: Ding Ruoyong, Shu Yi, Pseudograph
朱 岩(扬州大学文学院).
Zhu Yan (College of Literature, Yangzhou University).
0 / / 推荐
导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
链接本文: https://www.libraryjournal.com.cn/CN/
https://www.libraryjournal.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V41/I5/128