图书馆杂志

图书馆杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 56-62.

• 工作研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

CRITIC 评价方法的修正及在学术期刊评价中应用研究

俞立平(常州大学商学院)
  

  • 出版日期:2022-05-15 发布日期:2022-05-24
  • 作者简介:俞立平  常州大学商学院,博士研究生导师,教授。 研究方向:技术经济、科技评价。E-mail:yvliping@ 126.com 江苏常州 213159

Study on the Revision of CRITIC Evaluation Method and Its
Application in Academic Journal Evaluation

Yu Liping (Business School, Changzhou University)
  

  • Online:2022-05-15 Published:2022-05-24
  • About author:Yu Liping (Business School, Changzhou University)

摘要:  CRITIC 评价法根据指标对比强度与冲突性进行赋权,在评价中得到了广泛的应用,但 在学术期刊评价中应用可能存在问题。本文针对学术期刊评价的特点,提出采用平均差均值比代 替标准差、复相关系数代替相关系数、算术平均代替乘法合成来对传统 CRITIC 评价方法进行修 正,从而优化了传统 CRITIC 评价方法。修正 CRITIC 对评价指标的数据分布没有要求,比较适 用于学术期刊评价。修正 CRITIC 在不改变 CRITIC 评价的思想的基础上,全方位对传统 CRITIC 评价进行优化,是一种值得推广的评价方法。

Abstract: The CRITIC evaluation method gives weight according to the comparative intensity and conflict of indicators. It has been widely used in evaluation, but there may be some problems in its application in academic journal evaluation. In view of the characteristics of academic journal evaluation, this paper proposes to replace the standard deviation with the average difference mean ratio, replace the correlation coefficient with the complex correlation coefficient, and replace the multiplicative synthesis with the additive synthesis to modify the traditional CRITIC evaluation method, thus optimizing the traditional CRITIC evaluation method. The revised CRITIC has no requirement on the data distribution of evaluation indexes, and thus more suitable for academic journal evaluation. Since the revised CRITIC follows the evaluation philosophy of the traditional CRITIC, and optimizes the latter, it is an evaluation method worth popularizing.